12 Angry Men: Film
12 angry men explores through the struggles in todays society to do with racism, stereotypical views and judgments. This script interprites the way people view others and how they can conform and make decisions based mostly on incorrect judgements and not looking at the facts. This script displays the rights of an individual and the forces of conformity. 12 angry men is about the strong belief juror 8 has that the thought than the boy is not guilty.
Throughout the film he tries to influence peoples decisions to have an open mind and take the stories they have into consideration, look at the facts and evidence brought upon them and offer the boy a fair trial and judgement. He is a moral person and is fair this is shown throughout the film as he, at the beginning of the film, is the only one that considered voting not guilty, this displays his rights as an individual as he stands alone in the meeting infront of all the jurors and does not conform to them as they try force him to vote guilty so they could go home.
Only $13.90 / page
The other jurors were selfish and inconsiderate and didn’t It’s always difficult to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. And wherever you run into it, prejudice always obscures the truth. I don’t really know what the truth is. I don’t suppose anybody will ever really know. Nine of us now seem to feel that the defendant is innocent, but we’re just gambling on probabilities – we may be wrong. We may be trying to let a guilty man go free, I don’t know. Nobody really can. But we have a reasonable doubt, and that’s something that’s very valuable in our system.
No jury can declare a man guilty unless it’s SURE. We nine can’t understand how you three are still so sure. Maybe you can tell us” this quote reflects on how the jurors have all conformed and concluded that … is not guilty… the quote displays how juror 8 believes that their initial decisions were based on prejiduce s were made based purely on his race and their descriminative perceptions of him as a person because of his background. Juror 8 influences the men to base their decision not on their own personal dexcriminative beliefs but to look at the evidence and make a fair judgment.
Juror 3 stood strong and committed to his first impression and decision to state that the boy is guilty. Throughout the film he is a very stubborn and critical person who doesnt seem to be easily persuaded in his decisions “i dont care whether im alone or not its my right” this quote illustrates his stubborn,vindictive and relentless attitude. He doesn’t conform into the idea of the boy being not guilty. Howveer at the end of the film when juror 3 writes not guilty on the slip it shows how he has been influenced in his decision and gives a lighter shade to his character. Bright? He’s a common ignorant slob. He don’t even speak good English. ” this quote displays how juror 10 is basing his thoughts and decisions purely on his racial judgments. when he said he doesnt even speak good english this implies that he cant be intillectually smart just because he is from a different racial background. This shows how people are very prejiduce and analyse others based on their bacground culture beliefs and initial first impression. it reflects on society and how people conform and are weak their thoughts are based on the thoughts of many others. he text shows how juror 8 has the right and intitlement to his own beliefs and decisions. The film shows how he has the right to speak up for himself and voice his opinion. It displays how his thoughts are just as equal and important and its his thoughts that end up the most influential and true. 12 angry men analyzes the rights of one man and how his fellow jurors have stereotypical views and ideas, it shows how they eventually come to a reasonable and fair agreement, because they put aside their descriminative views and considered the evidence that was brought upon them.
The moral of the film was to show the strength and perserveirence juror 8 had and how he didnt conform and made sure he was given the right to stand up for what he believed in and voice his opinion which effected the decisions of many other jurors. 12 angry men shows the struggle of fghting against conformity and commiing to your own beliefs rather then going with the crowd . this shows a greater strength for juror 8 no biliography