1984 By Orwell Essay Research Paper Pain
1984 By Orwell Essay, Research Paper
Pain from cognition in Orwell & # 8217 ; s 1984
George Orwell & # 8217 ; s 1984 is a hauntingly prophetic novel that addresses the concerns of an single Born into a Totalitarian government. This government, named & # 8220 ; The Party, & # 8221 ; is ruled by a semi-fictitious all-knowing leader termed & # 8220 ; Big Brother. & # 8221 ; The Party controls the heads of its members through Crimethink, the telescreens and Newspeak. Winston Smith recognizes this control and Rebels against it through his journal and his adventures with Julia in an effort to recover his individuality. He is caught, nevertheless, and his individuality is destroyed. Nineteen Eighty-Four & # 8217 ; s message is mimicked in Ecclesiastes & # 8217 ; shuting remark: & # 8220 ; in much wisdom is much heartache, and addition of cognition is addition of sorrow & # 8221 ; ( 1:18 ) .
Smith industries lies in the Record Department in the Ministry of Truth. As an outer party member, he rewrites the history books to blandish the current disposal. The futility of his occupation discourages him.
Only $13.90 / page
He particularly hates & # 8220 ; the most bigoted disciples of the party, the swallowers of mottos, the amateur undercover agents and nosers-out of unorthodoxy & # 8221 ; ( 11 ) . He sees true cognition and thought as freedom from the subjugation of the Party. The storyteller provinces, & # 8220 ; With the feeling that? he was puting Forth an of import maxim, he wrote: & # 8216 ; Freedom is the freedom to state that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; ( 69 ) .
Most people within Oceania act as human soundtracks, spurting out the Party & # 8217 ; s propaganda with perfect easiness. Smith lived with the cognition that their words were simply manufactured mottos: he knew this because he wrote them. He existed on a higher rational degree than the multitudes he catered to. This cognition, nevertheless, brought wretchedness to his life because he objected to his organisation & # 8217 ; s doctrines. The outlook that the cognition evoked caused him to shout & # 8220 ; I hate pureness, I hate goodness! I don & # 8217 ; t want any virtuousness to exi
st anyplace. I want everyone to be corrupt to the bones” ( 132 ) . Even Smith’s love with Julia was false. The storyteller provinces, “No emotion was pure, because everything was assorted up with fright and hatred. Their embracing had been a conflict, the flood tide a triumph. It was a blow struck against the Party. It was a political act” ( 133 ) . Smith’s rebellion caused him to lose his pride, his intelligence and his individuality. He was taken to the Ministry of Love, where O’Brien asked,
& # 8220 ; What is your first inquiry? & # 8216 ; What have you done with Julia & # 8217 ; said Winston. O & # 8217 ; Brien smiled once more. & # 8216 ; She betrayed you, Winston. Immediately-unreservedly. I have seldom seen anyone come over to us quickly. You would barely acknowledge her if you saw her. All her defiance, her fraudulence, her folly, her dirty-mindedness-everything has been burned out of her & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; ( 271 ) .
In the Ministry of Love, Smith and Julia were both tortured. O & # 8217 ; Brien commented, & # 8220 ; & # 8216 ; You have whimpered for clemency, you have betrayed everybody and everything. Can you believe of a individual debasement that has non happened to you? & # 8217 ; Winston had stopped crying, though cryings were still seeping out of his eyes. He looked up at O & # 8217 ; Brien & # 8216 ; I have non betrayed Julia, & # 8217 ; he said & # 8221 ; ( 286 ) . Throughout his imprisonment, Smith clung to his self-respect and belief that his cognition would salvage him. Finally, nevertheless, he cried, & # 8220 ; Make it to Julia! Make it to Julia! Not me! Julia! I don & # 8217 ; t care what you do to her. Tear her face off, strip her to the castanetss. Not me! Julia! Not me! & # 8221 ; ( 300 ) .
After Smith regressed, he was released into society as another slogan-spurring person. His chase of cognition and freedom merely brought him farther from it. Therefore, Smith & # 8217 ; s desire for increased cognition merely magnified his hurting. Nineteen Eighty-four supports Ecclesiastes & # 8217 ; reading: hurting is an intrinsic portion of cognition. In Oceania, the jurisprudence, the amusement, even the linguistic communication prevents individualism and the attainment of true cognition