“A Man Without Words” by Susan Schaller Essay Sample
In her book. “A Man Without Words. ” Susan Schaller describes how the 18th century Gallic philosophers continually exercised guess as to how much of human nature was “given” and native. and how much was dependent on linguistic communication and civilization. She encountered Ildefonso. a Mexican Indian who lived in the most alone signifier of isolation. who was born deaf. and had ne’er been taught even the most basic linguistic communication. She set herself the challenge to do contact with this adult male. and present him to linguistic communication. Ildefonso non merely lacked any linguistic communication but lacked any thought of linguistic communication: he had no construct. at first. of what Schaller was seeking to make. yet Ildefonso had a longing to pass on and to be more than merely himself in isolation. Inclusively. this book vividly conveys the challenges. defeats. and the excitement of opening the head of a congenitally deaf individual to the construct of linguistic communication. I believe the subject that stuck out to me the most was mentorship—the mentoring of a language-less head. while conveying forth the qualities of forbearance. continuity. and. finally. growing in both Schaller and Ildefonso.
The entireness of the text reflected Schaller’s prevailing attempts of changeless and uninterrupted attention for Ildefonso’s success. no affair how hard their communicating had been between each other. Additionally. through her mentorship. she non merely talked about ASL but she besides exemplified the manus signifiers and gestures in which she was learning Ildefonso ; hence. the reader has an chance to larn from Schaller at the same clip. This novel was easy and merriment to read likely being because I was interested in the subject. Sign linguistic communication has ever been intriguing to me ; I even took a category at Grossmont when I was in high school. Being interested in the subject made reading schemes easier to prosecute in while reading. Some of these schemes I used were inquiring inquiries. footnoting in the borders of the text. and doing connexions to my ain personal experience. One inquiry I asked myself before Susan Schaller asked in the book was. “Is it even possible to believe without linguistic communication? ” I made the connexion that animate beings think without linguistic communication. so I could non see how people who are deaf could non either.
Furthermore. a personal experience I encountered was when I took a high school category with a miss who was besides deaf. Even though she was non precisely like Ildefonso. she opened my eyes to a different universe that many people do non understand and make non care to understand. On another note. some of the reading voices I had influenced the manner I read at times. For illustration. sometimes I would read a peculiar line. such as “I thought Charlie—the retarded adult male in Flowers for Algernon. and the experiment to do him intelligent ( p. 58 ) . ” and mention back to the clip when I read that book and get down believing about how cool it was that Susan mentioned this. Then I would make an elaborative idea of what other things Susan and I may hold in common with other related or non-related experiences. Additionally. when I read. “By now he should hold learned adequate linguistic communication to reply some of my old and new inquiries in item ( p. 142 ) . ” I had all of a sudden thought of the clip back when I was in kindergarten composing out my ABC’s. Throughout the whole paragraph of “reading. ” I was merely in one deep idea about what it would be like non being able to fit words with ideas.
These illustrations were both illustrations of deflecting voices. In comparing of reading this novel and the other pick novels. there were decidedly similarities and differences in the ways that I read. For illustration. one similarity among all the novels were the distracting voices. ensuing from reading the text and believing about something else that may hold related to the subject or was wholly off subject. Conversely. some differences among the novels were reading sentences/ paragraphs over. ensuing from deficiency of understanding. In “A Man Without Words. ” I did non happen myself holding to read over really many things. whereas I had to many times in “Flowers for Algernon” and “Black Boy. ”
Overall. as a consequence of reading this novel and the other two novels. I have learned in a wide sense that reading gives me the chance to really larn new. familiar. or unfamiliar information that I could potentially profit from—of class. I can profit from new cognition. Reading “A Man Without Words” has given me a better apprehension of Deaf civilization. and the ferocious pride that exists at that place. Furthermore. reading these novels allowed me to believe more critically about certain subjects. and has created a desire to read more books and hence go on my acquisition development along the manner. I know this is something that will surely assist me throughout my whole life.