A summary of Mary Ann Doane’s

1 January 2018

Mary Ann Deane discusses the use of voice in cinematic presentation in this article. She determines the acceptance of voice by the viewer by defining the phantasmal body of a film. This body is the replica created by the technology itself. It is the body of the character and of the film. Voices within a cinematic presentation are assumed by the audience to come from this body, even If they are off-screen voices.The acceptance of this off-screen voice by the audience is dependent on an understanding of space within the cinema itself.

It relies on an understanding that the frame of the visual image does not limit the aural space. Even the physical confines of the theater itself are not the limit of the digests or aural telling of the story. Though the visual story Is limited, the audience accepts auditory input from outside the frame. The audience connects this Input to the phantasmal body In and of the film. The traditional use of voice-off constitutes a denial of the frame as a Limit and an affirmation of the unity and homogeneity of the depicted space” (Deane, 1980)Deane defines three distinct spaces that are put into play for cinematic action. These are the space of the digests, the visible space, and the acoustical space. The digests is the space constructed by the film.

We will write a custom essay sample on
A summary of Mary Ann Doane’s
or any similar topic specifically for you
Do Not Waste
Your Time
HIRE WRITER

Only $13.90 / page

It is physically limitless encompassing all that Is portrayed within the film, including all visual and auditory cues.The visible space of the film Is that which Is contained In the viewing frame – the screen Itself. This space is recognized as visually limited, although auditory cues can come from outside the frame. The acoustical space is the space within which the sounds from the movie can be heard. This space is often defined within the theatre walls. Generally, sound appears to come from the screen and is thus visually activated, but an envelop the viewer as It seems to come from all around.Different voice techniques are used to affect the film’s spaces.

The use of voice to deepen the digests of a film occurs with the voice-off. The sound of a voice, though phantasmagorical connected to the film’s body, enhances the illusion that the space of the film goes beyond that of the visual frame. A viceroy can be used to suggest that there is more too character than is seen. Often these are the ‘inner voices’ of characters. In documentary, however, voiceless are accepted as being outside the visible and dietetic space of the film.Spectators accept these voices within the acoustical space as not connected to the body and thereby endow these voices with a truthful authority. Deane recognizes that sound and voice cannot be discussed in exclusion from the visual elements of film.

All the sensory elements work together to create the true ‘body’ of a film. The deployment of voice wealth the construction of a film greatly Bibliographically, M. A. (2004). The voice in the cinema: The articulation of body and space. In L. Brandy, & M.

Cohen, Film Theory and Criticism (up. 373-385). New York: Oxford University Press.

How to cite this essay

Choose cite format:
A summary of Mary Ann Doane's. (2018, Jan 17). Retrieved March 23, 2019, from https://newyorkessays.com/essay-a-summary-of-mary-ann-doanes-2/
A limited
time offer!
Get authentic custom
ESSAY SAMPLEwritten strictly according
to your requirements