Anthem and Girl in Hyacinth Blue Essay Sample
Ego. a sense of ego. is a struggle that all characters must confront in many different genres and literatures. Many people have their ain definition of what self-importance means. nevertheless. World Wide Web. dictionary. com defines ego as the “I or ego of any individual ; a individual as thought. feeling. or willing. and separating itself from the egos of others and from objects of its idea. Many writers use self-importance as a cardinal subject because it can easy be related to the reader and the audience. Throughout our universe today many define others as holding an alter self-importance or a superego. As I grew up I learned that holding an self-importance meant to be yourself. that is how I know to populate my life. It is of import for us non to to the full depend on others. but to hold assurance within ourselves. Our society is really alone about our actions.
Only $13.90 / page
happening our sense of ego is hard because of the altering position in the universe. Ego is shown through the society. being an person. and looking towards others for counsel. In the novels Anthem. Life of Pi. Girl in Hyacinth Blue and the drama Julius Caesar. along with the essay of Self – Reliance. all similar. but different in the same manner. the writers each explore the construct of self-importance ; finally. they argue that you can’t have freedom unless you know who your existent ego is.
Anthem. by Ayn Rand. is a fresh written to prosecute the subject of self-importance that is based upon Rand’s beliefs of objectivism. which gives high awards to the ego. Through demoing her beliefs. Rand describes the society of limited engineering and no promotions due to the high per centum of individualism among the citizens. All of their life. they are taught to populate for the “we. ” non cognizing that they are persons who need to larn to populate for themselves. “Our name is Equality 7-2521. as it is written on the Fe watchband which all work forces wear on their left carpuss with their names upon it” ( Rand. 18 ) . As a whole society they are treated for the “we” and the persons that they are. These unusual names of the characters strike the major subject of Anthem. Since the people of the society had no construct of individualism. they could non hold single names. merely Numberss. Some names represented good. and others were merely hypocritical to the society. “Liberty 5-3000. ” may hold symbolized autonomy among the citizens. but on the other manus. “Equality 7-2521. ” might intend the equality among mean work forces. Equality 7-2521. the supporter. struggles himself within the society.
He tried to carry through the Torahs of the society. but his professions as a street sweeper made him keep in his passion of scientific discipline. “We loved the Science of Things. And in the darkness. in the secret hr. when we awoke in the dark and there were no brothers around us… and we thought that we wished to be sent to the Home of the Scholars when our clip would come” ( Rand. 23 ) . While street brushing one twenty-four hours. Equality 7-2521 finds a portion of him that had been losing for some clip now. While Equality is populating in a wood he finds a sense of freedom that allows him to talk of the word “I. ” Subsequently on. after detecting his sense of ego. he began to reconstruct the society from the “Unmentionable Times” to a society where freedom was opened to all. “And yet there is no shame in us and no sorrow. We say to ourselves that we are a wretch and a treasonist. But we feel no load upon our spirit and no fright in our bosom. And it seems to us that out spirit is clear as a lake troubled by no eyes save those of the Sun. And in our bosom – strange are the ways of immorality! – in our bosom there is the first peace we have known in 20 years” ( Rand. 37 ) . Possibly what the state of affairs is. it could take a twosome of old ages. or even a life-time to happen your true self-importance that represents you. Through Rand’s book Anthem. she expresses that self-importance is of import because without ego you can non populate life to the fullest.
Life of Pi. a novel by Yann Martel. has a different manner of showing the construct of self-importance. Between two similar and different narratives. Pi is seeking to last for himself. He struggles with his ethical motives and finally goes against his ain moral system to last. Pi ends up losing his sense of ego ; between Piscine and Richard Parker. Pi would be the most narcissistic. Not merely does he lose his sense of ego. but he isn’t rather certain which faith he wants to believe or what ethical motives he wanted to follow from the beginning. In order to compromise to his beliefs he practiced Hinduism. Islam. and Christianity all at the same clip. Pi didn’t truly care about others or how he got what he needed. When he caught sight of something. he went with his first inherent aptitude. to travel for it. “It’s the field truth: without Richard Parker. I wouldn’t be alive today to state you my story” ( Martel. 164 ) .
Without Richard Parker. Pi would non be alive today to state his narrative. The “you” in the sentence is the writer in which Pi relates legion times excessively. In the first narrative. we find Richard Parker is a tiger and at first panics Pi. Finally. Pi comes to love the tiger because it soothes him and saves him from his solitariness. The preparation and taking attention of Richard Parker fills up Pi’s long. empty yearss killing clip. In the 2nd narrative. Pi himself is the tiger. Pi chose a tiger because he confronting force. barbarous force. and the deficiency of intelligence. Pi must return to nature and back to his carnal inherent aptitudes. He must encompass aggression in order to kill the cook who might hold even killed him. All in all. Pi faces multiple troubles. but the most of import one is his endurance for nutrient. His head tells him to whatever is needed to prolong his life at sea ; hence. he is acceptable to eat the crewman. In Life of Pi. while Pi surveies three faiths this is what he says to be morally right.
Girl in Hyacinth Blue. a novel by Susan Vreeland plays off people’s sense of ego and many experiences in different ways. The writer painted a fictional picture of Magdalena and wrote narratives that tracked back in clip. The narratives related to how the picture affected each of the proprietors lives. Each narrative shows a new manner in which the lives are affected. Cornelius Englebrecht’s male parent was the current proprietor. who stole it from a hapless Judaic household while working as an S. S. officer during the Holocaust. Cornelius knew of his father’s artlessness and self-importance. nevertheless. the picture showed the exact antonym. “Together they went over every square inch of the picture. seduced afresh by its appeals. yet the ecstasy was deficient to submerge out the truth Cornelius could no longer deny” ( Vreeland. 19 ) . Because of the picture. Cornelius had to accept his father’s ways and workss ; from the painting stand foring a first love with Laurens to major portion of Magdalena’s life.
Laurens gave his married woman the picture on their day of remembrance. yet this peculiar picture still reminded him of his old love. Soon after. his married woman found out. she was really demoralized. Day after twenty-four hours. they knew that both were lucky to hold each other. The picture besides represented a major portion in Magdalena’s life. Ultimately she was the focal point point of her father’s beautiful picture. When Magdalena was older. she wished to purchase the picture by her male parent ; she ne’er mentioned this thought to her male parent. but one day’s shows that the picture brought her and her male parent closer. Besides. this picture shows a piece of her inner freedom she had ever hid. Over the old ages. each of the different proprietors had some manner in which the picture touched their lives. It was non merely of import. but alone ; that is why this picture is much loved. With each new proprietor. each individual learned something new about their self-importance and a sense that they learned merely one more thing about themselves.
Shakespeare’s drama. Julius Caesar. displays a different image than Ayn Rand’s novel Anthem. This drama is set in the 1600’s when Brutus. a friend of Caesar’s was the Roman pretor. When Caesar arose to a Roman general. his aspiration and self-importance were two factors that brought him down. “Nor heaven nor earth have been at peace tonight. Thrice hath Calpurnia in her slumber cried out. “Help. Ho! They murder Caesar! ” – Who’s within? ” ( Shakespeare. 78 11: 1-3 ) . Even though Caesar was accomplished in many things. he did non hold to believe twice about accepting any awards that he was offered. Caesar is thought of as the most powerful and glorious swayer that has of all time come to Rome. However. the lone thing that Caesar attentions about is his power and his repute. He has merely returned from killing Pompey and his boies ; his lone logical thinking has to make with his aspiration for power and glorification. Although. Caesar may be powerful. his power is sought in the incorrect manner. Not merely was Caesar selfish. but Cassius and Brutus were excessively.
Cassius wanted to subvert Caesar because he was selfish and wanted the throne. On the other manus Brutus was more of the selfless character because he wanted to subvert Caesar for a good ground. Not merely was Caesar endangering the state. but the lives of many. Throughout. Shakespeare argues that a large self-importance can acquire you in deep problem. Not merely did this cost Caesar his life. but it besides affected his close friends who supported him. Without self-importance. this drama would non hold even taken topographic point because Caesar rose to such high authorization with his sense of selfishness for no 1 but himself. Self – Reliance. an essay by Ralph Waldo Emerson was foremost published in 1841. The essay has three major divisions: the importance of ego – trust. self – trust and being an person. and self – trust in a society. Emerson starts his major work on individuality by stating that it is of import to believe for yourself. instead than open up to others thoughts. “To believe that what is true in your private bosom is true for all work forces – that is genius” ( Emerson ) . If person chooses to trust on others sentiments. instead than their ain. they lack the creativity that is necessary for individuality. A common subject that ties the first subdivision of the essay together is to swear your inner ego. Society is non the step of all things ; an person is.
Throughout this essay. Emerson’s label for an person is “belongs to no other clip or topographic point. but is the centre of all things. ” Meaning. if you find you ego and be yourself. you will be the centre of your universe and your ain individualism. Many thoughtless people can non understand the construct of ego – trust because thoughtless people are excessively disquieted about being consistent as the society wants them to be. People every twenty-four hours battle with happening their ego – trust. Not merely immature grownups. but a assortment of all ages. Therefore. alternatively of working difficult and looking deeper within ourselves. we merely take the easy path. by depending on others to make our work for us. Emerson says that excessively many people are led by suggestion. desires. and others feelings. Apparently. it would be better for us to travel with our ain inherent aptitudes because our society is so different and others don’t ever think the same manner that we do. Alternatively of practising for our ego. we give in on others. Work force should larn non to to the full depend on others. but be aware of them.
Ultimately. everyone has a sense of ego. nevertheless. it may take a long to clip to happen the existent you. It is of import that as we live our lives. non to be lonely but to interact with others. As in Anthem. when Equality 7-2521 found himself one twenty-four hours while in a tunnel street sweeping. he decided to make society that was like him because it was a much better manner of life. Between two similar narratives in Life of Pi. Pi doesn’t truly cognize which manner to travel. He doesn’t cognize what moral system to believe or what faith [ s ] to pattern. Therefore. while he is stranded on an island. he struggles to hold a sense of ego and cognize who he is. Throughout the novels Anthem. Life of Pi. Girl in Hyacinth Blue and the drama Julius Caesar. along with the essay of Self – Reliance. they all have a different manner in showing their sense of self-importance. Although. each single writer portrays this characteristic. they have a reasonable manner in making so. All in all. the message that all of the beginnings give is to non trust on others for support. but to look deep within yourself to happen your ain individualism.