Binary Images In The Bronze Horseman Essay
Binary Images In? The Bronze Horseman? Essay, Research Paper
Alexandr Pushkin? s verse form? The Bronze Horseman? is a apparently glorious narration of the solidness of the great metropolis of Petrograd. The work extols Peter the Great and his amazing accomplishment of building a reflecting new metropolis whose beauty is contrasted with the lividness of its predecessor, Moscow. At first, the verse form gives Peter a fabulous quality and emphasizes his place as a national hero. ? The Bronze Horseman, ? nevertheless, does non picture Petrograd and its laminitis in a positive visible radiation for long. The latter subdivision of the work recounts the narrative of Yevgeni, a inhabitant of Peter? s metropolis whose life and dreams are ruined by a inundation which engulfs Petrograd. Pushkin uses sets of contrasting binary images to stress the disagreement between Yevgeni? s battle and the easiness with which the metropolis handles the crisis. One key contrast is between Peter? s illustriousness and Yevgeni? s humanity. This difference is apparent in his descriptions of the two characters? linguistic communication, places, aspirations, and destinies. Peter? s illustriousness is first emphasized in the verse form? s gap line. Mentioning to Peter merely as he, Pushkin gives the tsar a olympian tone from the beginning. Peter stands along a waste shore, holding vanquished the Finns. His head is full of grandiose ideas: programs for the hereafter and the transmutation of his state. Peter thinks and speaks in declaratory and unquestionable tones. ? From here we will stare down the Swede ; To hurt our haughty neighbour I shall establish a metropolis here. ? Yevgeni? s address lacks the assurance of Peter? s. Rather, his is full of inquiries, some being rhetorical and some being existent quandary which Y
evgeni must face. While Peter considers the construction of an entire city, Yevgeni occupies himself with thoughts of marriage, children and ?a humble, simple shelter.? While Peter strives to achieve immortality through his metropolis, Yevgeni thinks of his grandchildren as his legacy, and imagines going ?hand in hand to the grave? with his love, Parasha. During the flood, Peter has great concern for his city while Yevgeni has concern only for his loved ones. The fact that the czar is upset by the loss of a city while Yevgeni loses only a lover and a daughter gives an excellent perspective of the scope of the two characters? worlds. Peter?s greatness and broad responsibility prohibit him from sharing Yevgeni?s human concerns. Peter, instead of mourning the loss of people, laments that he was unable to ?master the divine elements.? Finally, the measure of Peter?s greatness versus Yevgeni?s (pathetic) humanity can be observed through their fates. Peter, arguably the greater of the two madmen, is immortalized through grand tributes. He leaves behind a window to Europe, a modern city bearing his name, and the majestic bronze horseman statue. Yevgeni, on the other hand, is not immortalized. While Peter?s love was a stone city which endured the high water, Yevgeni?s love was a woman of flesh who perished in the deluge. While Peter carried on with his remains, Yevgeni had no remains. His whole existence was ruined with the death of one, and his sanity died with her. ?The Bronze Horseman? can be interpreted to mean many things. All of those interpretations involve a conflict between Peter and Yevgeni?a conflict which Pushkin emphasizes through his use of contrasting images.