Black Student Movement At NIU Essay Research

10 October 2017

Black Student Movement At NIU Essay, Research Paper

? A Racist Institution: ? The Black Student Protest Motion

at Northern Illinois University, 1962-70

Jeffrey R. Hart

History 491, Dr. Schmidt

Fall 1997

1. NIU and Dekalb: The Corn Cob Community

Northern Illinois University, a medium sized four twelvemonth populace university, is located in the little metropolis of Dekalb, 60 stat mis west of Chicago on Interstate 88. Thirty stat mis from what is referred to as the western border of the suburbs, Dekalb seems in some ways to be caught between two universes: the universe of Norman Rockwell? s idyllic? Small-town, USA, ? and the universe of the infringing suburbs. Recently, the metropolis has seen the revealing marks of the invasive universe: the line of big section shops, place betterment shops, and fast nutrient eating houses along its main road on the border of town, pulling concern off from the downtown country, and the detonation of modern individual household lodging development in constructed vicinities, or? estates.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Black Student Movement At NIU Essay Research
or any similar topic specifically for you
Do Not Waste
Your Time

Only $13.90 / page


This invasion is best symbolized by the program approved by a former city manager and metropolis council to develop and construct a modest sized shopping promenade on the sou’-east border of town, located on another main road. The program calls for the developer to have the metropolis gross revenues revenue enhancement ( soon 1 per centum, added to the province gross revenues revenue enhancement of 6.25 per centum ) received by the merchandisers located indoors and instantly next to the planned shopping promenade. Former Mayor Greg Sparrow said that the revenue enhancement program was indispensable to enticing the developer. He and others feel that the new shopping promenade will convey Dekalb into the service-based economic system, and provide much needed occupations and revenue enhancement grosss for the metropolis.

Unfortunately for Mr. Sparrow and a few council individuals, the electors rejected his command for re-election to office in the spring of 1997, alternatively voting in favour of council individual Bessie Chronopoulis, who attacked non merely Mayor Sparrow? s temptation program, but besides the apparently rapid rate of alteration. To her and many of the occupants, the alteration was coming excessively fast, excessively shortly. Their ideal Dekalb is a little metropolis consisting of lasting occupants, or? townies? on the E and far southwest side, and the university and its community of pupils, sing module, and the concerns that cater to them ( bars, fast nutrient eating houses, flat composites, convenience shops, and even an grownup bookshop ) , on the west side. Indeed, some of the occupants closest to the university feel that even the university is infringing on their town, and they have lobbied their council-persons to see that the university community stays within its assigned boundaries by go throughing regulations curtailing the growing of get oning houses and other concerns that they feel detract from the historic vicinities of the country.

This conflict to either halt or abate growing, seen by many as cut downing non merely the value of the metropolis but besides its image, is in some ways indicative of what happened with the university over 30 old ages ago, with the turning inflow of minority pupils. During the decennaries of the 1950s and 60s, NIU had changed from a little four twelvemonth public establishment known for its teacher readying plan ( in fact, its old name had been? Northern Illinois State Teacher? s College? ) into a university of medium sized population and country. The country of the university expanded to twice its size with the acquisition of land bordering its western boundary. The new land provided infinite for new abode halls to house the turning figure of pupils. The undermentioned list indicates the growing in the pupil population.

On Campus Enrollment in Fall Semesters

Fall 1951 Fall 1955 Fall 1961Fall 1965Fall 1968


There university besides added new edifices to teach them in, made programs for the building of athleticss Fieldss and, more significantly, the enlargement of academic Fieldss non related to learning. This growing paralleled what had been go oning countrywide. Nationally, establishments of higher acquisition found themselves holding to spread out themselves to run into the demands of a turning population of pupils. The GI Bill and other federal and province plans, in add-on to a higher pay base for the working category brought approximately by the postwar economic roar and benefits of organized labour, enabled many pupils to go the first in their household non merely to graduate from high school, but besides to go to an establishment of higher acquisition.

The Black Student Protest Movement at NIU arose from the position that NIU, like other authorities establishments, was racialist in that it was non turn toing the demands of the black pupils enrolled in the university or the black high school pupils who wished to go to the university. They felt that due to de facto segregation at the school board degree ( peculiarly the schools in the inner-city of Chicago ) , the quality of direction at the schools they attended, the de facto segregation curtailing the motion of households to what seemed to be better schools territories outside of the interior metropolis, and eventually the admittances policies of the universities themselves, black pupils had a more hard undertaking of deriving admittance to public NIU than their white opposite numbers.

When the Civil Rights Movement began to take root in the northern provinces, black pupils on the preponderantly white campuses took action. When at the university, their experiences reinforced their beliefs about institutional racism and their geographic expeditions of? Black Power. ? After 1965, the Black Student Protest Movement changed in five ways: there were different marks, different aims, different participants, different manners of protest and activism, and the organisation of the Movement itself became different. Nationwide, the presentations shared the common aim of seeking to oblige preponderantly white establishments to suit the demands of a multiracial society. The pupils, Richard P. McCormick has written, wanted? the building of an environment within which they could experience emotionally and physically secure and where their cultural values would be respected and changed. ?

At NIU, the pupils wanted the same consequence. In the yesteryear, black pupils who happened to be allowed admittance to NIU were forced to populate off campus, kept apart from the? regular? pupils in the residence halls. This did non assist affairs really much, for there was normally merely a smattering of black occupants in the metropolis. They were made to experience apart from the university itself, and surely non portion of the metropolis.

However, during the decennary known for campus activism, the Sixties, the pupils were allowed to populate in the residence halls with their white opposite numbers. The integrating of campus lodging, nevertheless, introduced jobs in itself. Some pupils and their parents did non desire black pupils for roomies, neighbours, or floormates, and requested to be placed in other suites. The black pupils felt that there wasn? t a topographic point to plunge themselves in milieus they felt comfy. There was no diversion room where their music could be heard coming from a wireless and no survey sofa filled with art or literature of the African or Afro-american civilization. There were surely no categories where pupils were immersed with the history or civilization of inkinesss. The classs offered by the university, the black pupils felt, stressed merely the importance, and hence legitimacy, of the white civilization. To the black pupils, they were being told what was right and acceptable ( the history of white Americans and Europeans ) , and what was non ( the history of black Americans and Africans ) . The clip had come for alteration, and the pupils set out to do the alteration happen.

Like today? s occupants of Dekalb, some of the? established? members of the university accepted the alteration, some accepted but wanted to command the rate of alteration, and others didn? T want any alteration to happen at all. This is the narrative of how these groups acted towards each other, and how the alterations that did happen took topographic point. Many of the demands made by the pupils were the same as demands raised at the larger, more urban universities, and all of them were accepted. But the grounds that the demands were accepted at NIU were in some ways different than those at the other establishments such as Rutgers University, New York University, and San Francisco State University. Unlike other establishments located in or near interior metropoliss or other centres of big minority populations, Dekalb and NIU were located far from any ample minority population, and hence, reasonably free to make what it wanted without force per unit areas from groups outside of the university. Although non lawfully required to make so, NIU accepted and implemented some of the demands. This thesis explores how and why the university made alterations, every bit good as how and why a comparatively little group of pupils ( one per centum of the population ) changed everlastingly the face and organic structure of NIU.

2. ? Black and White Together, We Shall Get the better of: ? 1962-63

In 1954, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that public schools could non by jurisprudence offprint ( segregate ) the pupils of its territory on the footing of race, even when the schools appeared to be? equal. ? The instance, Brown v. the Topeka Board of Education, or more merely, Brown v. Board, made segregation of public schools illegal under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. It did non, nevertheless, open the public schools to black pupils in territories where segregation was taking topographic point. It lacked the power to implement its ain opinion, go forthing the duty to other subdivisions of the federal authorities, the provinces, and the local governments. In kernel, the determination became meaningless without person, anyone, willing to implement it. Surely, the racism of the federal, province, and local electorate played a major function, but so did the Court, when it mistily worded its order to incorporate the public schools with? all deliberate speed. ? Under these fortunes, governments were slow to move upon the order, but non every bit slow as the territories themselves. Without fright of legal branchings, many of the unintegrated territories remained untasted.

Most of these territories were located in the Southern provinces, where racism was identified by Whites and inkinesss across the state as a manner of life, good or bad. After all, the consensus was that the Civil War of 1861-65 had been fought over the issue of whether or non a white individual had the right to have a black individual as one owns an inanimate object, otherwise known as bondage. The Civil Rights Movement of the 20th century attacked this manner of life, get downing in the South. The Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955-56, the sit-ins at section shop tiffin counters, the? Freedom Rides? of the interstate coach lines, and the elector enrollment thrusts were all portion of a mass motion in the South to pull national and international attending to the double jobs of racism and its governmental enforcement or ignorance in the supposed most free state in the universe. The images of peaceable, nonviolent marchers being hosed, crush, arrested, and otherwise attacked by the local governments or white occupants caused many Americans, both black and white, to fall in together to alter life style of the South. When inkinesss and Whites from the North took clip off from school, work, and place, and went south to contend the southern manner of life, the apprehensions and whippings continued, and now the state and universe were seeing non merely inkinesss, but besides broad Whites being beaten and arrested, and in some instances, killed.

These images, of work forces, adult females, and kids being mauled by Canis familiariss, shooting with H2O hosieries, and beaten by looming white police officers, were abashing to the presidents, because it allowed the Soviet Union, our Cold War Nemesis, to claim that the US would handle colored 3rd universe states in much the same mode that it treated its ain colored citizens. The fright that these third-world states might fall into Soviet? influence, ? and hence act as an enemy to the US in the United Nations, led President Kennedy to get down actively implementing the Brown v. Board determination, to protect the nonviolent demonstrators peacefully exerting their First Amendment rights, and to name for statute law that would vouch equal entree to authorities sponsored and regulated concern and activities, including interstate coachs and their installations, and most significantly, the right to vote.

The job of racism was seen as a southern job by northern Whites, and every bit long as the issue was restricted to the South, it became? us? ( northern Whites and the state? s inkinesss ) versus? them? ( southern Whites seen as dense, backwards, uneducated hood ) . It was this attitude that led to the first publicised presentation for civil rights at NIU, on October 12, 1962. The Student Education Association held a mass meeting to turn to the racial job in Mississippi. The NIU community, like others in the North, were shocked and appalled that American citizens were being denied their most basic, cardinal right, the right to vote. The university newspaper, The Northern Star, gave a by and large positive position to the event, concentrating attending to the job in Mississippi, and depicting the attempts of Whites in the North to assist work out the job. However, the article did reference two things that we can now state were warnings of things to come. First, Walt Wernick, an adviser, told pupils to get down socially integrating, and pupil Barry Schrader said to look for racism in both Dekalb and NIU, adverting the segregated Greek ( fraternity and sorority ) community and the local lodging job ( inkinesss frequently could non happen person willing to sell or lease their place to black households, and lived in the same country ) . The calls to look homeward seemed to hold been ignored.

3. Turning the Fire Up on the Great Melting Pot: 1963-65

Another mark of things to come came in the autumn of 1963, when Dr. Martin Luther King, identified as the leader of the Civil Rights Movement, led the now celebrated? March on Washington, ? naming for an terminal to racism in the US, and support for President Kennedy? s proposed Civil Rights statute law. The Northern Star, in an column, stated that the March added to the agitation, that presentations were bad, and that equality could non be achieved by animus. The column stated that Dr. King had? overstepped boundaries of democracy and common sense. ? The same Dr. King, who had marched in Selma, Montgomery, Atlanta, and legion other topographic points in the South, and had won the regard of northern progressives, was now being denounced for making the same things in the North.

One can now see that this was what President Kennedy was afraid would go on when he heard of the proposal for the March. Initially, Kennedy

wanted to trash the March wholly, take a firm standing that it would ache the opportunities of acquiring his elector rights statute law passed. The March was intended to name for occupations, lodging, and freedom. Kennedy convinced the organisers that if they would alter their platform of the March to back up of his statute law, he would see that the federal authorities would back up them. He called for deviating attending off from presentations and towards acquiring the right to vote because he felt that while Americans valued autonomy for inkinesss, they valued jurisprudence and order even more. So the March occurred, King delivered his? I Have a Dream? address, and the President averted what he felt would hold been a catastrophe for everyone.

Another predicting mark came when some black pupils in Chicago? s public schools boycotted categories to protest what would shortly go an oft-heard phrase: ? de facto segregation. ? The pupils had walked out of their schoolrooms to protest being forced to go to schools that were overpoweringly black due to the manner that the school territory boundaries had been drawn, a pattern known as? gerrymandering. ? If the pupils were being forced to go to these schools, and non allowed to go to other, ? better, ? preponderantly white schools because of gerrymandering, so the instance could be made that in fact, and non in pattern, that the pupils were being segregated.

The instance was made, and the opposition to alter came with it. The Northern Star, in an column, said that the pupils were incorrect to boycott the categories. Supplying grounds that would turn out Kennedy correct, the column stated that while there may or may non be de facto segregation, the pupils were obligated to esteem the jurisprudence and work within the establishments. Finally, as yet another mark of what was to come, the column stated that bussing as a solution to stop the supposed segregation was incorrect. Common subjects between the NIU community and the state began to look. Equally long as the Civil rights Movement confined itself to the South, it would stay to hold the moral and fiscal support from northern progressives. However, when it moved into the North, non-violent, peaceable tactics approved for usage in the South, such as boycotts and Marches were frowned upon. When issues such as de facto segregation were addressed, many Northerners become defensive, and immune to alter.

That is non to state that Northern Whites had stopped back uping the Civil Rights Movement. In fact, what became known as? Freedom Summer? occurred that same twelvemonth, and NIU played a function. Nine pupils from NIU, as portion of the Northern Wesley Foundation, including one black pupil, Verna McClure, spent their spring semester holiday in Georgia working to acquire the black occupants registered to vote. From campuses across the North, pupils, clergy, and homemakers went to the South to assist the Civil Rights Movement in their federally approved and supported battle.

What happened that autumn, when the registered black electors of Mississippi found that their right to vote meant non being able to stand for themselves as the legitimate delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Atlantic City, is seen as the beginning to the terminal of cooperation between black and white militants. The Mississippi Free Democratic Party ( MFDP ) , whose symbol was the Black Panther, allowed all individuals registered to vote in the federal election to vote in the province party primary, while the Mississippi Democratic Party, allowed merely whites to vote. The National Committee, under President Lyndon Johnson, offered to let the rival MFDP to sit two of its members as delegates at big, and the seats allocated for Mississippi would travel to the members of the? regular? Democratic deputation from the province. To farther perplex the state of affairs, Johnson ordered that at least one of the seats given to the MFDP had to be occupied by a white. Martin Luther King accepted Johnson? s footings, while Stokely Carmichael, caput of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee ( the organisation that lost 3 of its workers in Mississippi to the shotgun blasts of a deputy sheriff and other members of a local Klan ) refused.

The rift between civil rights workers, leaders, and northern white progressives, became more broad. Many of the inkinesss working in the Civil Rights Movement began to mistrust their white opposite numbers, whom they felt had ever been moving paternalistic towards them. Within a twelvemonth, the organisations led by younger, more active black pupils had purged themselves of their white members. The older, soft-spoken and more acceptable leaders, such as King, were seen as seeking to? snog up? to an constitution that had rigged their attempts to neglect by throwing the inkinesss into the sphere of electoral political relations, an sphere that, by definition, was a topographic point where the bulk would take whatever it wanted, and the minority would have nil but merely what the bulk allowed it to hold.

Possibly as an indicant of the rift between the white progressives and black militants, on March 26, 1965, merely six individuals ( a white reverend, four white pupils, and one black pupil ) left NIU to pass their spring interruption in Selma, Alabama, to process in the streets for black civil rights. They left NIU 13 yearss after one hundred and 50 people at NIU protested the decease in Selma of a white reverend who marched for civil rights. As a sideshow, there were two white counter-demonstrators. The? broad consensus, ? as Godfrey Hodgson described the black/northern white/labor/clergy alliance, becan to break up.

4. ? Burn, Baby, Burn! ! : ? The Pot Boils Over

In May of 1965, Hosea Williams, of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, warned an audience at NIU that the Civil Rights Movement was heading north, and that Illinois might be the first province to experience the impact. He described racism in the North as really different from that of the South. In the South, he said, it was vocalized, but in the North it was soundless. At this period of clip, inkinesss in the North, sing racism in the signifier of de facto school segregation, lodging segregation, and unemployment, began stating each other and anyone who cared to listen that they would no longer be soundless while Whites in the North pointed fingers at Whites in the South. Riots erupted in the Watts territory of Los Angeles ; in Cleveland ; in Newark, New Jersey ; and many other metropoliss across the North. Images of constabulary and National Guard units policing the streets with pieces, helmets, and unassailable waistcoats filled the telecasting screen amid backgrounds of angry, loud, and endangering immature black work forces venting their choler in words and workss. Fortunately or unluckily, Dekalb and NIU were spared those workss, but non the words.

The motto of? Black Power? began to be said and to be heard. Many Whites seemed non to hear the statements of how black pupils in inner-city schools were being given a second-class instruction, and how poverty begot poorness, but paid attending to two simple words: ? Black Power. ? Did the individuals who spoke these words know that they were acquiring attending? Stokely Carmichael, one of the first leaders in the Movement to publically utilize the phrase, knew so, and so did Baronial Harris, president of the African-american Cultural organisation ( AACO ) . In the December 14 issue of The Northern Star, he defined Black Power as inkinesss finding their ain scenes, actions, and consequences, free from force per unit areas put upon them by Whites. As an admonition to those who had all of a sudden taken notice of the state of affairs of inkinesss in the North, Harris stated that? They should hold known we had jobs. ?

In Chicago, a metropolis known for its broad, Democratic political machine, King marched in Marquette Park, naming for an terminal to lodging favoritism. The working category occupants and others responded with bricks and bottles. King commented that the racism in Chicago was worse than the racism in the South. These words produced indignancy from the Whites. King became an enemy to many Whites across the state for his activities, including his resistance to the Vietnam War.

Like other members of the Civil Rights Movement, he was abandoned by many members of the white broad community, for both his civil rights activities, and his stance against the War. To white conservativists and some progressives, he was disloyal for being against the War. Other white progressives, turned off by the rhetoric and purgings of the SNCC, had abandoned the Civil Rights Movement after 1964 and turned their attending to the war in Vietnam. To the anti-war/anti-draft progressives, Dr. King was passing excessively much clip on the Civil Rights Movement, and non adequate clip on the Anti-War Movement. King felt that the war and civil rights were inseparable, and wanted more white progressives to work towards stoping racism as they worked towards stoping a war. As if King did non hold adequate jobs with Whites, he faced misgiving among inkinesss every bit good. He was seen by many immature militants as an? Uncle Tom, ? a? apple polisher, ? person who would make the command of? The Man. ? On April 4th, 1968, in Memphis, as he was fixing for a multiracial? Poor People? s March on Washington? , King? s earthly jobs were solved by an bravo? s slug, and the jobs of others across the state, including NIU, were brought to a caput.

5. Year of Discontent: 1968-69

In the hebdomad following the blackwash of Dr. King, more than a 100 metropoliss experienced public violences. The decease count reached 37 people, 12 of them in the state? s capital. Fires and plundering were common scenes in metropoliss with a ample black population. The decease of Dr. King at the alleged custodies of a white adult male had provoked more of a response from black activists and militants than his call for a united biracial run to process for economic freedom.

At NIU, an ad-lib memorial service was held at the University Center ( now the Leslie A. Holmes Memorial Student Center ) . Black and white, pupils and module likewise, met to retrieve the late Dr. King, and to reflect on the significance of his non-violent life and violent decease. Two things occurred which were meant to direct a message to the white module and pupils of the university. The first was a verbal warning sent by two black pupils. An unidentified pupil said that the inkinesss in America were about to? make its thing. ? Fifty individuals left the service when alumnus pupil Noble Harris issued a call for a? united forepart, ? stating? With integrity, doggedness, bravery, and love of our black people, we shall be winning in our struggle. ? Outside of the Center, a black flag was raised on the range pole, in topographic point of the Stars and Stripes.

The following twenty-four hours brought alleviation to the community, when spring interruption began, and the pupils went place. A few pupils patrolled the streets of their hometown or other metropoliss with their constabularies auxiliary or National Guard units, while some pupils may hold really participated in the public violences in Chicago, and others may hold stood by and witnessed them first manus or seen the telecasting footage. This point is certain: as with the public violences that had taken topographic point in the northern metropoliss in the old summers, everyone knew that they were happening.

When the pupils and module returned to NIU from the interruption in surveies, an uneasy composure came with them. Unlike the larger metropoliss and universities, the black pupils were surrounded by a rural, all-white community. There might be presentations, but the university felt that, unlike the larger metropoliss, there was non the? critical mass? needed in the black community to convey about the devastation of the university or town. For two hebdomads, there was comparative peace, sing what was go oning in the state outside of the academic confines of NIU.

However, the university did non hold to wait really long, when on May 10, about 200 black pupils, armed with the cognition of tactics used by earlier Civil Rights Movement militants, moved towards Lowden Hall, the administrative offices edifice. The pupils climbed the stepss of the late constructed edifice, with it? s modern ( for the Sixties, at least ) design, possibly made to look like the regional central office of a modern concern. Approximately 100 pupils crossed the fanciful barrier between acceptable and unacceptable protest, and placed their academic and, possibly, future professional callings in hazard, and went inside the edifice towards the office of University President Rhoten Smith.

Walking down the corridor, they may hold had feelings that they had perfectly nil to lose, that win or non, they would at the really least do person, anyone, listen to them ; demanding for one time in their academic callings and possibly in their lives to be recognized as legitimate individuals with legitimate concerns. Other pupils walking towards the office may hold been more hesitating, oppugning if their ain engagement was deserving losing everything they had worked for in high school, if it was deserving losing the chance to possibly be the first individual from their household to graduate from college. Veterans of war will sometimes talk of the fright of being in conflict, but making things they ne’er thought they could make, if merely because the fright of making the incorrect thing was non as bad to them as the fright of making nil at all. To many of the pupils, inside the edifice every bit good as exterior, this fright was really existent to them. Their fright was overcome by their choler.

The module inside the edifice were afraid, excessively. President Smith had sensed that things would come to this Oklahoman or subsequently, and hopefully subsequently. He had come to NIU with the realisation that the construction and intent of the university was altering, and that the alteration could be for the better. Described as a? imperfect? , he had come to NIU with a? vision. ? His vision for a university in general, and NIU in peculiar, was non alone. A few old ages before, at the University of California at Berkeley, President Clark Kerr described his? vision? of a? multiversity? that worked closely with authorities and concern, supplying them with an intelligent work force and having research grants and federal money. Kerr saw the university as an of all time turning establishment functioning a turning public. Smith? s vision for NIU included all of those things. He knew that to vie with the other universities, NIU would hold to be attractive to as many pupils as possible, by spread outing the size of the campus, and spread outing and adding plans in the non-teaching Fieldss of survey. He saw the demand for the university to respond to the altering universe around it, and to him, this meant an increasing figure of black pupils with high school sheepskin.

The pupils entered President Smith? s office, and occupied it by making nil other than sitting down. The university, for all purposes and intents, came to a dead halt, much like a machine that had been? m

How to cite this essay

Choose cite format:
Black Student Movement At NIU Essay Research. (2017, Oct 08). Retrieved August 16, 2019, from
A limited
time offer!
Get authentic custom
ESSAY SAMPLEwritten strictly according
to your requirements