Bowling for Columbine
Bowling for Columbine Introduction When I first heard the name of the film; ‘Bowling for Columbine’, I thought this was a movie only about the Columbine High School Massacre in year 1999. I was wrong about it. This movie is much more than that; he dug for the truth – how come the massacre happened. I will be focusing on how the movie is build up, how he gets the attention, because I have never seen anything a exciting documentary before. Main Ideas In this documentary it is the real view of America’s gun problem. We are going to hear the blames, but there is not really any too blame.
The Americans thinks it is easy to blame others, I agree too, but they are the problem, or at least the gun law. It’s irresponsible of the government, and that’s one of the things something this movie poses. ‘Bowling for Columbine’ is about everything from guns, too racism, too the NRA and heavy rock n’ roll. It is a combination of shootings and interviews of different people, with different backgrounds. The problem with the American’s, is their completely useless thought of needing a gun to protect them from everything.
The “right to defend yourself/ property” is overrated, but they will not look the truth in the eyes. It is just a circle of evil. Analysis ‘Bowling for Columbine’ is very easy to watch, your attention is focused 90% at Michael Moore. He uses the right effects at the right times – like the voiceovers and cutting. There are a few themes in his documentary; the violent American history, school, the murder rate, the media, racism, the Nation Riffle Association (NRA), and then he compares USA to others country’s like Canada – Canada and America are neighbors, but totally different when it comes to crime!
Michael Moore interviews people, and when he does that, he uses pathos, logos, facts, ethos to influence the victims. He also uses irony, provoking, humor, and sarcasm when he interviews his interviewee. Discussion I think Michael Moore has putted a lot of heart in this movie, because it is very thoughtful, because it is such a huge problem. I think he is the only one who has done something about gun arms, there has to be done more about it. I really think it is a great movie; it is the best documentary I have seen in my life.
It is humorous and disturbing, and I believe Michael Moore planned this out – to amuse and scare the viewers at the same time, while watching this movie. I gives him thumbs up for choosing such a hard subject, but still making space for a little bit of fun. That is extremely good. Michael Moore speaks from his own point of view in “Bowling for Columbine”, but he remains a balance between subjective and objective, and that gives a space for our own opinion, it also gives us a reason to think twice.
This documentary really has my attention, and I have seen it three times. It has still not gotten old and boring, because Michael Moore has the viewer’s attention. I think it has a stance between a film and a documentary, but it is irrelevant because we know it is real. Before I saw “Bowling for Columbine”, I knew it was easy to get access to guns, but my mind almost got blown up, when he went to the bank and got a free gun, because he opened a bank account, although there were some security checks etc.
Conclusion I see Michael Moore as a doer. He might have thought about it, but he sat his mind to it, even though it must have been very hard, and I respect that very much. It is a thoughtful movie, and that inspires people to believe America has a chance to become a more peaceful place. He takes action, and that shows that he cares very much for his country. It is a very good movie, America could learn something by watching this documentary.