Brave New World 2
Brave New World & # 8211 ; Compared To Fahrenheit 451 Essay, Research Paper
Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451 are two books, both of which are supposed to be set in the hereafter, which have legion subject similarities throughout them. Of all their common factors, the 1s that stand out most would hold to be foremost, the illegitimate reading of books ; second, the saving of wellness and young person at about any cost and the maintaining of people happy and stress-free ; and 3rd, the subject of the supporter as being a lone wolf or an castaway from society because of his differences in beliefs as opposed to the norm.
We & # 8217 ; ll look foremost at the construct of illegitimate reading. To us this sounds really unusual. In the societies of both of these books, nevertheless, it is a common and about wholly undisputed jurisprudence. In Brave New World reading is something that all categories are conditioned against from birth.
Only $13.90 / page
In the really beginning of the novel we see a group of babies who are given bright, attractive books but are exposed to an detonation and a scream Siren when they reach out for them. This therefore prevents them from desiring the books and causes them to shout and shrivel off in horror at the mere sight of the books. In mention to the achievement of this conditioning, the manager said, & # 8220 ; Books and loud noises & # 8230 ; already in the baby mind these twosomes are compromisingly linked ; and after two hundred repeats of the same or a similar lesson would be wedded indissolubly. What adult male has jointed, nature is powerless to set asunder, & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 21-22 ) . We come to larn that the basic logical thinking behind this conditioning against reading in Brave New World was because & # 8220 ; you couldn & # 8217 ; Ts have lower-caste people blowing the Community & # 8217 ; s clip over books, and at that place was ever the hazard of their reading something which might unwantedly decondition one of their physiological reactions & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 22 ) .
In Fahrenheit 451 the outlawing of book reading is taken to an even greater extent. In this novel the whole intent of a & # 8220 ; fireman & # 8221 ; isn & # 8217 ; T to set out fires, instead it is to get down fires. The reading of books in their society is wholly out and if person is suspected of even having a book, the firemans are dispatched to travel to that individual & # 8217 ; s abode and get down a fire. They start fires for the exclusive intent of destructing books, as illustrated here, & # 8220 ; They pumped the cold fluid from the numeraled 451 armored combat vehicles strapped to their shoulders. They coated each book, they pumped suites full of it & # 8230 ; & # 8217 ; the whole house is traveling up & # 8217 ; & # 8221 ; ( Bradbury 38 ) .
Another common factor of the two novels is the extent to which each society works to continue its people as both immature and healthy and content. In Brave New World the people have soma, the feelies, they are ne’er entirely, they & # 8217 ; rhenium conditioned to wish their occupation, and life for them is merely made easy. Soma is what the people in Brave New World usage to travel on & # 8220 ; holiday. & # 8221 ; It is like the perfect drug with no side effects. It merely puts its users in a province of euphory. Harmonizing to Mustapha Mond himself, haoma is to & # 8220 ; quiet your choler, to accommodate you to your enemies, to do you patient and enduring & # 8230 ; anybody can be virtuous now & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 238 ) . The feelies are yet another construct of the Brave New World designed merely for the comfort and enjoyment of the people. The people experience the films in non merely the ocular sense, but they besides feel and smell what is traveling on, about as if it truly is. The construction of their whole life style is made in such a manner so that the people are ne’er entirely. Mond even says, & # 8221 ; But people ne’er are entirely & # 8230 ; we make them detest purdah ; and we arrange their lives so it & # 8217 ; s about impossible for them to of all time hold it & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 235 ) . The different castes are besides conditioned to wish their occupations. This maintains stableness because everyone does their occupation without ailment and remains happy. Harmonizing to Mond, & # 8220 ; they like their work & # 8230 ; It & # 8217 ; s light, it & # 8217 ; s childishly simple. No strain on the head or the musculuss. Seven and a half hours of mild, unexhausting labor, and the the soma ration and games and unrestricted sexual intercourse and the feelies. What more can they inquire for? & # 8221 ; ( Huxley224 ) .
Equally far as life being made easy for them goes, Mond says, & # 8220 ; There isn & # 8217 ; t any demand for a civilzed adult male to bear anything that & # 8217 ; s earnestly unpleasant & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 236 ) . Similarly, in Fahrenheit 451, the people have telecasting walls. We learn ab
out their intent, importance, and value from the character Mildred. In respects to the walls, Mildred tells Guy, “It’s truly fun. It’ll be even more fun when we can afford to hold the 4th wall installed…it’d be merely like this room wasn’t ours at all, but all sorts of alien people’s rooms” ( Bradbury 20-21 ) . Equally far as young person or wellness saving goes, in the really beginning of Fahrenheit 451 we see an illustration of this. Guy comes place to happen Mildred in bed, overdosed on pills. He called the exigency infirmary and they came. “They had this machine. They had two machines, truly. One of them slid down into your tummy like a black cobra down an echoing good looking for all the old H2O and the old clip gathered at that place. It drank up the green affair that flowed to the top in a slow boil…the blood stream in this adult female was new and it seemed to hold done a new thing to her. Her cheeks were really pink and her lips were really fresh and full of colour and they looked soft and relaxed” ( Bradbury 14, 16 ) .
The concluding and one of the most apparent of the similarities in these two books would hold to be the fact that the chief character in both books was fundamentally an castaway or a lone wolf from society. In Brave New World this is, at different times, a different character. First we meet Bernard Marx as our castaway. He thinks merely a little more than the mean adult male in his society. He and his friend Helmholtz Watson are two work forces who stand apart because they really think instead than drone around like the remainder of the people. Bernard is besides much smaller than most other alphas and has a difficult clip both acquiring adult females and acquiring lower castes to make what he says. When speech production of Bernard, one of the adult females says, & # 8221 ; They say person made a error when he was still in the bottle- idea he was a Gamma and put alcohol in his blood-surrogate. That & # 8217 ; s why he & # 8217 ; s so scrawny & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 46 ) . It isn & # 8217 ; t until Bernard additions care over John that he is anything but an castaway. For the first clip in his life he can acquire any adult female he wants and he even believes he has power. However, after things fall apart and the barbarian is no longer under his control, Bernard goes back to being an castaway and is even finally sent off to an island by himself. The 2nd individual viewed as an castaway in Brave New World would be John the barbarian. He ne’er fits in while he lives on the reserve because of who his female parent is and what she & # 8217 ; d done to the reserve. He is invariably secluded from activities and looked down upon, as we see here, & # 8220 ; He went with the others & # 8230 ; all of a sudden one of the work forces stepped frontward, caught him by the arm, and pulled him out of the ranks & # 8230 ; & # 8217 ; Not for you, white-hair! & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 136 ) . Though he excessively has his period of credence when he comes to the Brave New World, he finally returns to his lone ways. In the terminal, despite Mond & # 8217 ; s wants to go on with the research, John ran off and moved into an abandoned visible radiation tower to populate as a hermit. Similarly, in Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag is reasonably much a lone wolf himself. Though he is a fireman, he in secret steals more and more books and the more he reads, the lupus erythematosus he believes in firing them. He can non state anyone of this, even his married woman, because they will certainly turn him in. Eventually, though, Guy & # 8217 ; s secret is discovered and the remainder of the narrative consists of the pursuit after him by the constabulary every bit good as the electronic hound. He makes his acquire off entirely and though he meets others along the manner, he travels entirely. The other lone wolf in this book is Clarisse. Clarisse new she was an castaway and even said, & # 8220 ; I & # 8217 ; m afraid of kids my ain age. They kill each other & # 8230 ; I & # 8217 ; m responsible. I was spanked when I needed it, old ages ago. And I do the shopping and house cleansing by manus & # 8221 ; ( Huxley 30 ) .
Outlawed reading, contentment, juvenility and wellness of the people, and society outcast- these three subjects are, to me, the most apparent in the two books. I find it improbably intriguing that two different writers can both compose books on the hereafter and hold them similar in so many ways. If you look past their similarities though, both of these books were really good written and truly go forth you inquiring merely what the hereafter will keep.
Brave New World. Huxley, Aldous. Perennial Classics. New York, 1989.
Fahrenheit 451 & # 8230 ; The Temperature At Which Books Burn. Bradbury, Ray. Ballantine Books. New York, 1979.