Coercive Power Essay Sample
Definition: “A signifier of influence through which the employee obeys. but merely because of the presence of threats” ( Satterlee. 2009. p. 111 ) .
Summary: The article I chose was “The intersection of power. trust and provider web size: deductions for supplier public presentation. ” by Bryan Ashenbaum and Regis Terpend ( 2012 ) . The article examines the decussate effects of power. trust and provider web size on the five dimensions of provider public presentation. The five dimensions are bringing. quality. cost. invention and flexibleness. In measuring the statistics. the article claims that coercive power shows a negative relationship with provider quality and invention. It besides states that referent power shows a positive relationship with all dimensions of provider public presentation. and legitimate power shows a positive relationship with provider bringing. cost and flexibleness. The supplier’s trust in the purchaser besides shows a positive relationship to all of the provider public presentation dimensions. While exhibiting no chief effects. provider web size moderates these power-performance relationships. The survey basically says that choosing the right figure of providers may hold a considerable consequence on the relationship between power. trust and public presentation in buyer-supplier relationships.
Discussion: As stated before. Coercive Power is “A signifier of influence through which the employee obeys. but merely because of the presence of threats” ( Satterlee. 2009. p. 111 ) . Basically. a foreman could utilize his or her power to coerce employees to make their work. A foreman may coerce an employee to execute by endangering to utilize that power against them. A foreman could convey up menaces such as the possibility of firing the employees or even docking them wage. The article I chose. “The intersection of power. trust and provider web size: deductions for supplier public presentation. ” by Bryan Ashenbaum and Regis Terpend ( 2012 ) . evaluates the statistics involved when foremans utilize the different types of power. The article states “The usage of coercive power–essentially the devising of threats–showed a important connexion to poorer quality and invention public presentation in the whole-sample model” ( Ashenbaum and Terpend. 2012 ) . These statistics reflect that utilizing coercion to act upon employees merely affects employees negatively. Furthermore. it states “It is possible that when the buyer–supplier relationship moral force is characterized by coercion. the provider is disinterested in sharing new inventions or in supplying new ideas” ( Ashenbaum and Terpend. 2012 ) .
The usage of coercion is mentioned several times in the Bible. Ezekiel 34:21 ( English Standard Version ) states “Because you push with side and shoulder. and push at all the weak with your horns. boulder clay you have scattered them abroad. ” In this case. the word “push” is synonymous with coercion. This poetry tells us that the usage of coercion will clearly non convey your employees closer. but alternatively rupture them apart. A perfect illustration of coercive power at usage in the Bible is found in Daniel 3. In this transition. Nebuchadnezzar demanded everyone in his land to idolize the aureate statue of himself. He declared that whoever did non bow down to his statue would be thrown into the ardent furnace. This is a definite portraiture of coercion. Nebuchadnezzar brought his topics the menace of certain decease if they did non make as he demanded.
From these points. I believe it is clear that the usage of coercive power is non an effectual manner to take. A foreman who coerces his employees to work does non convert his employees to work expeditiously. and besides distances himself from his employees. This is affirmed non merely in the scholarly articles. but besides in the most of import beginning of all. the Bible.
Ashenbaum. B. . & A ; Terpend. R. ( 2012. July ) . The intersection of power. trust and provider web size: deductions for supplier public presentation. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 48 ( 3 ) . 52+ . Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //go. galegroup. com. ezproxy. autonomy. edu:2048/ps/i. make? id=GALE % 7CA302115384 & A ; v=2. 1 & A ; u=vic_liberty & A ; it=r & A ; p=ITOF & A ; sw=w
Satterlee. A. ( 2009 ) . Organizational Management and Leadership: A Christian Perspective. Roanoke: Synergistics Inc.