Freire and Richard Rodriguez Paulo Freire’s essay “the banking concept of education” and Richard Rodriguez’s essay “the achievement of desire” talk about the topic of education. Education is explored In many different ways. In Freire’s essay “the banking concept ot education” he expresses his dislike of the education system and the distribution of power and authority In the class room. In his essay, he says that all the power belongs to the teacher.
We will write a custom essay sample
on Comparison Paulo or any similar
topic specifically for you
Richard Rodriguez’s essay “the achievement of desire” he states that the power belongs to the student. In many wap, these two influential writers are similar and at the same time have completely dfferent views about education and the education system. Rodriguez spoke of being filled with the knowledge of his teachers and knowledge from reading what he called his “Important” books, despite being considered a “scholarship boy’. In his essay he referenced himself to being a classic student of the banking system and noted that he was an Imitative and unoriginal pupil(Rodriguez 516).
As you read Rodriguez’s essay you see that through Freire’s lens, Richard Rodriguez saw himself as a banking student, but could later be seen as problem-posing student throughout the course of his life 80th styles are still viewed today in teacher-student relationships. In Rodriguez’s essay, The Achievement of Desire, Rodriguez Illustrates the characteristics of an automaton, thus confirming Freire’s views regarding the banking concept. Despite his classification as a “scholarship boy”, Rodriguez lacked his own point of view and confidence, which led him to be dominated by his teachers and his books.
In the eyes of Paulo Freire, Rodriguez was considered a receptacle. He did not actually understand the knowledge he absorbed Freire would claim that the “words are mptied ot their concreteness and become a hollow, alienated, and alienating verbosity” (Freire 318). Instead of understanding the Information Rodriguez was learning, he depended on his books and teachers to fill him with their Ideas and beliefs. These deposits of information caused Rodriguez to become unimaginative. After submitting to his teachers and to his books, Rodriguez slowly turned into what Freire would call an “automaton.
Page 2 Comparison Paulo Essay
He detached himself from his parents and siblings and turned to books for comfort. He submerged himself in reading and studying, and distanced himself trom social Interaction. Rodriguez became not only removed trom his parents; he actually became ashamed and embarrassed of them. Rodriguez only seemed to relate to his teachers. “l came to idolize my grammar school teachers. I began by imitating their accents, using their diction, trusting their every direction. I read then waited for them to tell me which books I enjoyed” (Rodriguez 5). As a scholarship boy, Rodriguez conformed to the banking concept in other ways as well.
According to Rodriguez, “The scholarship boy is a very bad student. He is a great mimic, a collector of thoughts, not a thinker… ” (523). This not only describes Rodriguez; it also illustrates the theory of the banking system. In the banking system Freire states that, “The student records, memorizes, and repeats without perceiving what the significance is” (Freire 349). Freire believed that students did not think on their own, they simply memorized information divulged to them. This belief parallels Rodriguez and the memorized information he retained from the books he read.
When Rodriguez read his books, he was like a robot. He did not read to understand or interpret the books, he read for the soul purpose of saying that he had read that book. Most books,” Rodriguez confesses, “l barely understood. While reading Plato’s Republic, I needed to keep looking at the book Jacket comments to remind myself what the text was about. And by the time I reached the last work, relieved, I convinced myself that I had read The Republic” (Rodriguez ). Rodriguez was oppressed by his books. He did not comprehend or appreciate the narratives he read.
At a young age Rodriguez felt that it was necessary to read adult books rather than works written for children Freire labeled this as the, ‘”banking’ concept of education, in which the scope of action allowed to the students extends only as far as eceiving, filling and storing the deposits” (Freire 349). Rodriguez read the books for his teachers, so that he would become more like them. Rodriguez didn’t realize, however, that he was becoming more of an automaton than anything else. He was not taking the opportunity to I can relate to both Freire and Rodriguez and what they are expressing in their essays.
Sometimes I wonder if it is a student’s choice to be a receptacle or is it really he teachers not taking the time to make sure that the student is fully understanding the essay and what it is asking them to do. I am not the type of erson to bury myself in my books and ignore the outside world because I know that a student can learn a lot from the world if given the chance. Rodriguez didn’t realize, however, that he was becoming more of an automaton than anything else. Rodriguez was thoroughly dominated and oppressed by his books and by his teachers. He lacked a voice and an opinion as well.
Rodriguez is not only an automaton, but also of a banking concept student. He is a container holding the ideas and thoughts of distant authors and impersonal teachers. Rodriguez does not have opinions or beliefs of his own. His mind is filled with borrowed information and is missing analysis, examination, and point of view. After reviewing Rodriguez’s education, Freire would undoubtedly classify him as a quintessential representation of a banking system pupil because in Freire’s words, “Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories” (349).
I believe that Freire, author of “The Banking Concept of Education”, felt very strongly that the literate arts hold a great deal of meaning to this world. He says, miet only through communication can life hold meaning” (Freire 256). Writing, reading, and listening are definite forms f communicating. Communication is so important in our world today. Where would we be without it? Freire also states that “Knowledge emerges only through invention and re-invention” (Freire 257). I believe that this pertains to writing and getting your them.
According to Freire, we can only gain knowledge if we are using the literate arts and creating ideas to communicate with the world. Freire does not agree with the separation concept that Rodriguez explains. Freire says that “People do not exist apart from the world, apart from reality, the movement must begin with the human- world relationship” (266). Freire believes that the differences in our lives are a good thing. However, in Freire’s essay it is noted that he does not believe that education is an “objective process, if by objective we mean ‘neutral’ or Without bias or prejudice” (256).
We have to work for our education. It doesn’t Just come to us when we go to classes. We have to want it. We will not all have the same ideas about education, we will have ‘contact zones’, but through debate with other opinions we can educate ourselves even further. They help us to better understand and relate to others. How can you be happy if you do not even know who you are? I feel like expression can set you apart and above, or to help you to fit in. If you want to “leave a lasting impression, you have to use the tools of the literate arts.
As college students, we still have to continue our education on the literate arts. Gaining this knowledge and understanding will help us to be better prepared for the work field that lies ahead of us. A key element that Rodriguez and Freire both speak of is banking education. Freire feels that this type of education is almost useless. Banking is no more than Just listening to someone speak at you and then regurgitating the information. Both speak about education in the context of the student-teacher relationship.
The banking theory of education only allows for the teacher to rule over the classroom and allows for little interaction with students. “The teacher is no longer merely the-one-who-teaches, but one who is himself taught in dialogue with the students, who in turn while being taught also teach” (249). Freire stresses the importance of problems for the mind in order for critical thinking to take place. Because of the mind is at work, people are able to form their own opinions and ideas instead of Just storing information and accepting it.See More on Education