Cruelty in Animal Testing!
Cruelty in Animal Testing! BY L0te93 Hobbes, the cat, has been under experimentation for most of his life if not all of it. This is probably the last time that he will ever have to be experimented on again. Why? Because he is probably not going to live through the experiment this time. The makers of Herbal Essences are about to force shampoo down his tiny throat to see what happens to its organs. Even if Hobbes lives through the whole ordeal, they are going to kill him to see which organs the shampoo could have damaged. If this was an actual human going through this deadly experiment, people would be in shock nd absolutely forbid it.
Instead, scientists are testing whether or not swallowing shampoo would affect a cat, which is absurd because this product isn’t being made for cats, it being made for use by humans. Testing on animals is a very cruel process that should not be allowed to take place.
Only $13.90 / page
Animal testing started many years ago to help provide humans with information. The process of animal testing is one of the most disturbing experiments in history. Many cosmetics and personal care lines are made every year and put into the market after being tested on defenseless animals.
Almost every product has been animal tested at some stage in its development process. The website titled “Animals in Product Testing” stated, “… these products have gone through a long and complex testing process that leaves millions of animals mutilated, burned, poisoned and gassed in outmoded and unnecessary tests. ” From these different experiments, animals are often left with different diseases like Syphilis or AIDS (“Animal Rights: Animal Testing”). Manufacturers of these different products say that they are performing these tests to assure our safety for these products.
They want to make ure that humans are not in any amount of danger. (“Animals in Product Testing”). My first point why animal testing is a morally wrong process is because of some of the brutal things that happen in the process. There are certain types of animals they use for certain types of experimentation. Some well-known animals that they use for testing are: cats, dogs, mice, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, gerbils, sheep, llamas, cattle, owls, deer, monkeys and other primates. These are not, by any means, all of the animals that they use. These are Just the most common (“Animal Rights: Animal Testing”).
For example, the Draize Test is used on white albino rabbits (S. , Jeremy). They use white albino rabbits because of their sensitive eyes and also because the formation of their tear ducts stops tears from draining away all of the foreign substance (“Animal Rights: Test … “). In this experiment, scientists rub shampoo, soap, toothpaste, lipstick, or lawn products into their beautiful, red eyes. From this point, scientists record the damage that they observed. This test can last up to eighteen days or even longer with the poor animals eyelids held open with a clip.
Many of the abbits end up breaking their necks trying to escape from the horrifying pain. First of t is pointless to keep the product in their eyes tor that long ot a peri od. There is no way that even a child would have something like that in his/her eye for very long. The second reason this is unnecessary to do to a rabbit is that the eye tissue of a rabbit is completely different from humans. The pain they go through for no beneficial reason is ridiculous (S. , Jeremy). Why do companies even agree with animal experimentation? Some companies, like Clairol, demand that they do not use animal testing on their shampoo product,
Herbal Essences. Even though they have cut down on animal testing, they have not eliminated the complete line of cosmetics and other products of animal experimentation (“Consumer Companies… Animals”). There are also some companies, like Mother’s Bath products, that do test on animals. The only difference is they shampoo their own dogs to see how it smells after being cleaned off with water. This type of procedure is not actual animal testing. The reason being is because it is not harmful and does not injure the animals in any way.
Mother’s Products inventor did mention, “Beyond these happy olunteers WE DO NOT TEST ON ANIMALS. All other product testing is done on ourselves, friends, & family. ” This is the best type of testing to do, on real human beings (“Mother’s Cupboard Bath… “). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has different laws about the safety of humans health. In other words, the FDA and the different laws agree with animal testing. The FDA supports two different acts, the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy and Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (“Animal Testing”).
The Animal Welfare Act is to assure the health of humane care and the anagement of dogs, cats and other certain animals that are used for research and experimentation. As well as to make sure that humane treatment of animals during the transport to help protect the owners of the animals from theft (U. S. Fish… ). The Public Health Service Policy and Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals is a law that assures animal care for farm animals, mice and rats (“Public Health… “). The FDA feels that if animals are used instead of actual human beings, then there is no risk of taking a human’s life.
If animals are put under experimentation, then the loss of an nimal wouldn’t be as devastating as an actual person. Other companies like: Arm & Hammer, Gillette, Procter & Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive, SmithKline, Beecham, and Unilever still test their products on animals (S. ,Jeremy). Another element why animal experimentation is Just plain cruel is because in multiple ways, it is pointless. The reason that companies even test their products on animals is because they are supposedly watching out for our safety. Most toxic products are tested on different animals.
Some toxic products that are used are: soaps and detergents, and toilet cleaner, etc. What is wrong with this picture? The internet site titled, “Animals in Product Testing” stated, “… no amount of animal testing can change the fact that many of these products are harmful if ingested or used in a way not intended by the manufacturer. ” In other words, there is no reason to torce animals to swallow any toxic products, when no matter what, they would harm someone if they digested it (“Animal in Product Testing”). Also, many different types of drugs are very useful to human beings, but are very dangerous and deadly to animals