David of Michelangelo vs David of Bernini
These features are reflected In Bering’s David and they contrast Michelangelo David. While the realism and dynamism of Bering’s David make it a typical Baroque work, Michelangelo David high idealization and more static and solid pose make it a typical work of High Renaissance art. The statues represent the same character, the David who beats Goliath, and they both embody the ideal of male form in a natural setting rather than posed.
Michelangelo and Bernie were able to give personality, emotion, and quite nearly a soul to their works.In this sense, the statues are similar because they both were Innovative with respect of the ancient tradition that created works that were perfectly balanced, but not as perfectly evocative. However, there are some differences between the two David : the timing of the action that they capture, their physical characteristics, and their involvement with the surrounding space. While Michelangelo depicted a David who is contemplating a task ahead of him, Bernie captured the young man already involved In the action that will mark his success.This Is where the differences between the statues originated: Michelangelo work had to manifest confidence, focus and controlled emotion, all necessary for a man who is preparing for something; Bering’s had to be all about the determination involved in the heroic act and its dramatic character. Michelangelo David shows focus, confidence, and controlled emotion through its stability. The statue is shifting his weight in contrasts from one leg to the other.
The head that is dramatically hefted to the left counterbalances the distribution of the weight, thus also enhancing the stability of the statue. The attention to the details of the almost dilated pupils, knitted brows, and half-opened mouth, contributes to the dramatic character of Davit’s expression. This expression leads the viewer into understanding that the young men is staring into space, seemingly preparing himself psychologically for the battle ahead of him rather than standing straight to manifest pride for its victory.However, the pose of Davit’s body clashes with his concentrated glaze. David is in a relaxed pose with a slingshot over his shoulder, while his facial expression does not convey relaxation at all. This pose conveys artificiality to the statues and also compromises its involvement with the surrounding space and the viewer that inhabits it. Michelangelo David appears victorious and confident, but, in doing so, it doesn’t connect with the viewer in a way that he or she can relate to it.
Additionally, because, differently from Bering’s David, the gaze of Michelangelo statue is erected onto the left rather than to the front, it doesn’t project energy In the looks in the direction of the viewer, as if his adversary was behind the viewer. Bering’s David intrudes in the viewer’s space also through its dynamic pose and involvement of space. David is portrayed while he is loading his sling and wining up to hurl the stone at Goliath. To render the dynamism of this action, Davit’s body is twisted and his gaze points ahead of him, in direction with the viewer and creates a connection with him.Additionally, the twisting of the body allows for it to be viewed from different angles and under different points of view. In doing so, the percentage of space that interacts with the statue and its observer is greater than the space that that involved in Michelangelo David. In contrast with Michelangelo David, whose facial and body expressions did not match, the facial expression of Bering’s David is coherent with his body.
Davit’s facial expression is that of a young men who strains and grimaces with an effort that is echoed by his body.Additionally, Bering’s David is more mature, with his lean, sinewy (fibrosis) body, tightly clenched mouth and straining muscles, is all tension, action and determination. A final difference between the statues is the variety in texture. Bernie uses various effects of the marble to create extreme differences in its texture. The texture of Bering’s David changes from his hair versus his body, versus the tree trunk. Michelangelo did not do this. Although he worked the marble in a remarkable way, it is evenly smooth and does not vary in texture.
Despite their differences, both sculptures support the idea that the artist behind them wanted to convey. Michelangelo David captures the moment of concentration through the extreme stability of the composition; David is stable and set with gravity. Bering’s David renders the dramatic action through dynamism and engagement of the viewer; as a result, the statue shows almost a disregard for gravity. Michelangelo David is there to be admired, he stands for the supremacy of right over might. Bering’s David is there to shock the viewer and move with him in the surrounding space.