Does God Exist Essay Research Paper Does
Does God Exist? Essay, Research Paper
Does God Exist?
St. Thomas Aquinas has written several of import plants. Some of them
are: The Disputed Questions on the Power of God, Exposition of Dionysius on the
Divine Names and Disputed Questions on Spiritual Creatures. Most of Aquinas & # 8217 ; s
plants have been written to seek to turn out the being of God. Aquinas has been
a house truster that everything had to hold a Godhead and the lone possible
solution would be something called God. It is with this thought that Aquinas & # 8217 ; s
Third Way was written.
In his De aeternitate mundi Contra murmurantes, Aquinas insists that
human ground can non turn out the impossibleness of an everlastingly created existence.
Once once more Aquinas has written with the certainty that God has to be in order
to hold created the existence. There is no uncertainty in Aquinas & # 8217 ; s mind that
everything was created for a ground and that ground was God & # 8217 ; s will.
Only $13.90 / page
In the text Medieval Philosophy, St. Thomas Aquinas & # 8217 ; article entitled
Does God Exist? , Aquinas tries to demo the different stairss that can turn out God
does be and that the universe had to hold been created by God. This article is
comprised of five different ways in which Aquinas tries to turn out that we can be
sure that God exists. In the 3rd manner, Aquinas tries to demo that God exists
if it is true that we exist.
In the article Aquinas says that it is possible for things to be and
for them non to be. He means that populating things will one twenty-four hours go non-
populating things. Aquinas believes that all things can non be mortal because if it
were true, so at some point nil would be. What he means is if all
things were populating things, intending that they had to be mortal, so at some clip
these things must besides go non-existing.
Aquinas says that if everything were mortal, so nil could be
bing at present, because what is nonexistent Begins to be merely through
something which already exists. This can be translated to intend that if all
mortal things have to halt bing so there can & # 8217 ; t be anything which exists
today. Aquinas believes that it takes a life presence to assist make other
unrecorded things in order for them to populate besides. This means that there must hold
been something which existed through infinity to assist make living things which
Aquinas believes that something had to hold created life throughout clip
in order for things to be populating today. He says this thing must hold existed
from the beginning and that it must still be now. His belief is that populating
things and inanimate things have lived through infinity with the aid of a
higher, more powerful presence. He besides says that if it were true that nil
existed at one clip, so it would be impossible for anything to get down to be
once more, intending nil could be now, which is evidently false. What he means
by this is that it takes a life presence
to assist make other living things.
It is impossible for anyone to logically believe that things such as
stones, trees, and H2O can be without at that place being a Godhead. It is for this
ground that Aquinas believes that God was the lone thing that existed so, so
hence he must hold been the 1 who created everything.
This theory does turn out that something had to be from the beginning.
The job I did happen with this theory is that it doesn & # 8217 ; t turn out that God exists
but that something existed. What I mean by this is Aquinas calls this thing God
but he doesn & # 8217 ; t turn out that it & # 8217 ; s the & # 8216 ; God & # 8217 ; that people believe to be.
Most people would hold that God is something more personal than
Aquinas & # 8217 ; theory of God. The image of God is interpreted otherwise by many
people, although most of these people would hold that God must be all knowing,
truthful, honest, loving, patient, forgiving and ageless. The all knowing and
loving God is non the same as Aquinas & # 8217 ; God because Aquinas merely proved that God
was something space.
Aquinas & # 8217 ; theory does non turn out that God is patient, loving, or forgiving
which is what God is believed to intend to most people. The image people have of
God doesn & # 8217 ; t merely halt at being our Godhead.
Another job which I found while reading Aquinas & # 8217 ; article is that it
doesn & # 8217 ; t explicate Darwinian theories. Darwinians base their theory on development.
Darwinians believe that God doesn & # 8217 ; t exist but that all life things have
evolved through nature. The thought of development and germinating from nature agencies
that there could non hold been a Godhead but that one molecule started the
procedure of development. This theory can & # 8217 ; t be really be disputed in Aquinas & # 8217 ;
3rd manner because he merely uses the word God to intend Godhead.
Darwinians could state that the first molecule could besides be called & # 8220 ; God & # 8221 ;
if people wished, although it wouldn & # 8217 ; t be the signifier of God Christians believe in.
In both theories, Aquinas & # 8217 ; and Darwin & # 8217 ; s, infinite arrested development is used. Both of
these theories lead to different thoughts of where bing things came from.
Aquinas 3rd manner has some little jobs which can be argued by
atheists and Orthodox Christians. I agree with what Aquinas had to state in his
3rd manner to be true. I believe that it must be true because all things must
hold had a Godhead. While talking to an Anglican curate, I learned that he
besides agreed in Aquinas & # 8217 ; theory because he was taught that the inquiry would
still remain of who created the molecule. The inquiry will ever stay how
did God evolve. I can non reply this inquiry but Aquinas & # 8217 ; theory has helped
me understand the procedure of life things and I is no longer doubt that God is
Aquinas, St. Thomas. & # 8220 ; Does God Exist? & # 8221 ; In Medieval Philosophy: From St.
Nicholas of Cusa, 335-38. John F. Wippel, Allan B. Wolter, ed. New York: The
Free Press, 1969.