Electoral College Is Wrong Essay Research Paper
Electoral College Is Wrong Essay, Research Paper
The Electoral College is the name given to a group of voters who are nominated by political militants and party members within the provinces. The electoral college truly isn & # 8217 ; t necessary and should be abolished. There are legion grounds why this is so. With the Electoral College in affect 3rd parties don & # 8217 ; Ts have a opportunity to go the president, which isn & # 8217 ; t just. Voters are expected to be honest but in the past our state has caught some untruthful 1s. The electoral College was created so long ago that it is now outdated, so we shouldn & # 8217 ; t even have voters. Peoples of the U.S. may believe that they are take parting in a direct election for the president, but with the Electoral College system technically, this International Relations and Security Network & # 8217 ; t the instance.
Having merely two campaigners running for the leader of our state restricts our picks for president. If a 3rd portion wins the bulk of the popular ballot, that doesn & # 8217 ; t needfully intend they will be the president because it & # 8217 ; s all up to the voters. If the campaigner doesn & # 8217 ; t win the voters & # 8217 ; ballots so they will non hold a opportunity of winning. This happened in the 2000 election. This is really unfair. & # 8220 ; In 1992 Ross Perot won more popular ballots than Clinton, but he did non win any electoral ballots so he was dropped from the election ( Glennon, 1992 ) . & # 8221 ;
We are supposed to hold faith in the voters of our province. In theory, they are supposed to vote for the campaigner who won the popular ballot of that province, but you can & # 8217 ; T ever swear them to make so. You may believe that they are voting for who they should, but they could be truly voting for who they want. Voters besides vote rather a clip after the people. With the clip in between, certain things could alter their heads on who they want to
win. “There have merely been twelve unfaithful voters in U.S. history. The most recent was in 1988 in West Virginia ( Glennon, 1992 ) .”
The Electoral College was created 200 old ages ago and times have decidedly changed. Peoples are good educated these yearss, and have a better apprehension of the whole election procedure. Two centuries ago people didn & # 8217 ; Ts have Television, wireless, intelligence broadcast medium, or the cyberspace. These are all good beginnings that to provide us with more than adequate coverage of the elections at manus. The whole system makes no sense, because depending on how large a province is, depends on how many voters that province has. The smaller the province, the more voters it has. It should be the other manner around. Besides population denseness has changed over clip.
If a campaigner wins the popular ballot but non the electoral, so they do non win the election. This is unjust. If the people want a certain individual for their leader than that & # 8217 ; s who it should be. The Constitution says to reasonably stand for the people. The Electoral College is the entire antonym. How the people feel doesn & # 8217 ; t even matter. People shouldn & # 8217 ; t even vote if their ballot doesn & # 8217 ; t count. What & # 8217 ; s the point? In a democracy, people are the most of import. The Electoral College prohibits people to be the most of import.
Sing all these facts and fortunes, it is clear that the Electoral College is non something that this state needs. It goes against everything this state stands for. The U.S. is a good educated, rational state, that has the capableness to take a president. The Electoral College should be history.
Glennon, Michael J. & # 8220 ; When No bulk Rules: The Electoral College and Presidential Succession. & # 8221 ; Washington, D.C. : Congressional Quarterly, 1992.