Electoral College System Essay Research Paper After
Electoral College System Essay, Research Paper
After the last presidential election, which is still underway seemingly, there is much contention over what should go on to the Electoral College system. There are people who say that the Electoral College is good but should be modified to run into the demands of the modern universe. There are those who say that the Electoral College system is excessively outdated to be modified and should be wholly eliminated. Finally there are those who say that it is has stood the trial of clip and is still the best system for our state.
The original framers of the fundamental law evidently preferred the electoral system to a direct popular election. The statement that historians give for this is that they preferred this system because travel was hard and there were no national party organisations. I personally reject this statement. I agree that travel was hard back so, but wouldn & # 8217 ; t that have meant that the campaigner who lived closest to the most largest provinces would hold an un-fair advantage under the electoral system back so? The historiographers add that the framers feared that many regional campaigners would split the ballot, and that by necessitating a campaigner to win a bulk in the Electoral College was a manner of obtaining a national nose count.
There have been many efforts to reform or even trash the Electoral College election sense it & # 8217 ; s birth. The most recent one being in 1997 when Congress debated a constitutional amendment to replace the electoral system with a direct popular ballot system. However the Electoral College system to this twenty-four hours remains virtually un-changed from its original signifier. The lone exclusion is the 12th amendment, which requires each voter to project two ballots, one for president and one for frailty president.
Under the current system there are five hundred and 30 eight voters. Each province gets one voter, each representative, and a senator. A presidential campaigner demands two hundred and seventy ballots to win the election. The voters meet after the November popular election to project their ballots and officially elect the president. Tocopherol
readers may vote for whomever they wish. Each state’s electoral ballots are awarded on a victor take all bases.
The statements to modify or extinguish the Electoral College system are all derived from the impression that it is outdated. Under the current system if a campaigner wins a big provinces like California, so they win 20 per centum of the needed ballots even though California merely accounts for 11 per centum of the U.S. population. What & # 8217 ; s more is a president can be elected without winning a bulk of the popular ballot. This has happened 15 times in U.S. history. The fundamental law allows voters to utilize their discretion. Seven times in history an voter has non casted his ballot for the peoples pick. Fortunately this has non yet had a existent affect on the result of an election. Under the current system each states electoral ballots are awarded on a victor take all footing. This makes it highly hard for a 3rd party or independent campaigner to win any electoral ballots. In fact, by concentrating support in certain provinces, a campaigner can take the presidential term with out winning more popular ballots than his opposition. Harmonizing to the 1990 nose count, a campaigner merely needs to win 11 of the most to a great extent populated of the 50 provinces in order to take the presidential term.
The statements to keep the Electoral College system are all derived from the impression that it has worked all right therefore far. There have been many efforts to reform the electoral system but none of them have been successful. This is due to the fact that no election system is perfect, but the current system has stood the trial of clip. It has ne’er rejected the victor of a popular ballot bulk. It ever produces clear and instantly known victors, so far. Geting rid of the Electoral College system would be deeply unsafe. Particularly with the manner modern elections are conducted. This would intend that the entirety of our runs would be a telecasting advertisement tarmac sort of run. We would be passing the American presidential run to whatever media advisor could out slick the other, and non needfully to the best campaigner for our state.