Elements Of The Argument
: & # 8220 ; What Is Poverty? & # 8221 ; Essay, Research Paper
Elementss of the Argument: & # 8220 ; What is Poverty? & # 8221 ;
Steve Ross Expository Writing Dr. Nancy Nester Final 10/25/96
What do you see poorness to be? Do you have a unequivocal
account of it or make you see it an abstract circumstance? In the
article & # 8220 ; What is Poverty? & # 8221 ; , Jo Goodwin Parker gives her thoughts on what poorness is.
First given as a address, this article is written as an onslaught on human emotion.
Her usage of connotative linguistic communication creates many rough images of her experiences in
a life of poorness. By utilizing these images, Parker is capable of doing the
reader to experience many emotions and forces the reader to oppugn his or her ain
stereotypes of the hapless. With the usage of connotative linguistic communication and the ability
to elicit emotion, Parker successfully compels the reader to analyze his or her
ideas and beliefs on who the hapless are.
Parker & # 8217 ; s usage of connotative linguistic communication causes the reader to experience many
emotions. Of these emotions, a outstanding one is guilt. Parker is capable of
doing the reader experience guilty for the ownerships that he or she has. For
illustration, she uses the phrase & # 8220 ; You say in your clean apparels coming from your
clean house, & # 8230 ; & # 8221 ; ( Parker 237 ) . This causes the reader to experience guilty for holding
the chance to be clean when we all know that she doesn & # 8217 ; t have the same.
She calls hot H2O a & # 8220 ; luxury & # 8221 ; ( Parker 237 ) . To those populating in poorness hot
H2O is a luxury. The unimpoverished return it for granted and ne’er before
considered it anything other than a basic ownership. When the reader hears
that person else calls it a luxury that they can non afford, he or she can & # 8217 ; T
aid but experience guilty for holding it as a basic ownership. Parker besides attacks
the guilt of the reader through narratives of her kids. She knows that some
readers may non experience guilty for things that happen to her, but when kids are
introduced to the state of affairs they will experience more guilt. She says, & # 8220 ; My kids
have no excess books, no magazines, no excess pencils, or crayons, or
paper & # 8230 ; & # 8221 ; ( Parker 238 ) . The reader can non assist but experience guilty for holding these
basic things when her kids, who need them, make non. Another thing that
Parker makes the audience experience guilty for holding is wellness. She says, speaking
about her kids, & # 8220 ; & # 8230 ; most of import of all, they do non hold health. & # 8221 ; ( Parker
238 ) . She goes on farther to depict what is incorrect with them. Parker says,
& # 8220 ; They have worms, they have infections, they have pink-eye all summer & # 8221 ; ( 238 ) .
These descriptions of her kids cause the reader to experience atrocious for them.
By doing the reader experience this manner she is increasing the degree of guilt the
reader besides feels. She is really successful in carry throughing this and this
success causes her statement to go really powerful.
Not merely does she do us experience guilty for holding ownerships that she
can non, but Parker besides makes us experience guilty about the stereotypes we hold. She
knows what society & # 8217 ; s stereotypes are and she successfully combats them. Parker
knows that society thinks the hapless Don & # 8217 ; t want to work. To assail this she tells
of why she can & # 8217 ; t work. She has three kids. The last clip she had a occupation the
baby-sitter she left them with did non take attention of them. She returned to happen
all three in unsafe state of affairss. Her babe had non been changed since she had
left it at that place, her other was playing with a piece of crisp glass, and her oldest
was playing entirely at the border of a lake ( Parker 236-237 ) . Her opportunities of
happening a better baby-sitter are slender because she can non afford a nursery school
due to fact that she makes excessively small ( Parker 237 ) . This is why she can non work.
Her inability to work leads to many of the other stereotypes that society has
of the hapless. Society inquiries why the hapless can non be clean. She tells of how
without money she can non afford any cleansing supplies ( Parker 237 ) . Parker
Tells of how she saved for two months to purchase a jar of Vaseline and when she had
eventually saved plenty the monetary value had gone up two cents ( 237 ) . She can non rinse in
soap because it has to be saved to clean the babe & # 8217 ; s nappies ( Parker 237 ) . She
efficaciously shows how society & # 8217 ; s stereotypes are wrong. She is capable of
doing the reader experience guilty for the stereotypes and causes the reader to
inquiry why he or she has them. If the audience would merely take a small clip
to seek and understand her state of affairs they would cognize how baseless the
Parker is besides successful in arousing understanding from the reader. She uses
connotative linguistic communication to make distressing images of what poorness is. For
illustration, she calls poorness an & # 8220 ; acid that trickles on pride until pride is worn off
( Parker 239 ) . & # 8221 ; Not merely is poverty bad but it is an acid. An acid is a
atrocious thing. It burns and corrodes off at something until it no longer
exists. By this concluding poorness is destructing her life. This phrase forces
the reader to see poorness as something worse than they had of all time thought
before. She shows poorness as a expletive, as a & # 8220 ; chisel that french friess on award until
award is worn off ( Parker 239 ) . & # 8221 ; Parker starts about every paragraph with a
new definition of what poorness is. Some illustrations are: & # 8221 ; poorness is being tired & # 8221 ;
( Parker 236 ) , & # 8220 ; poorness is ungraded & # 8221 ; ( 237 ) , & # 8220 ; poorness is inquiring for aid & # 8221 ; ( 237 ) , and
& # 8220 ; poorness is looking into a black hereafter & # 8221 ; ( 238 ) . All of these phrases create a
different image of poorness and each one is a success in arousing understanding from
the reader. They all force the reader to conceive of poorness in a new manner. We all
knew it was bad but Parker makes us recognize how black poorness is. She shows us
that there is no hope for the hapless without understanding.
Parker is successful in acquiring her point across with her usage of
connotative linguistic communication and her ability to make images. She has done a good occupation
of assailing the reader and acquiring him or her to listen to what she has to state.
Even though she attacks the audience she does it in an appropriate manner whereas
she does non come across as violative. All in all, Parker has done a successful
occupation at making images and utilizing the readers & # 8217 ; emotion to acquire an audience to
listen to her predicament and the battles of other & # 8217 ; s in her state of affairs.