Elements Of The Argument

10 October 2017

: & # 8220 ; What Is Poverty? & # 8221 ; Essay, Research Paper

Elementss of the Argument: & # 8220 ; What is Poverty? & # 8221 ;

Steve Ross Expository Writing Dr. Nancy Nester Final 10/25/96

What do you see poorness to be? Do you have a unequivocal

account of it or make you see it an abstract circumstance? In the

article & # 8220 ; What is Poverty? & # 8221 ; , Jo Goodwin Parker gives her thoughts on what poorness is.

First given as a address, this article is written as an onslaught on human emotion.

Her usage of connotative linguistic communication creates many rough images of her experiences in

a life of poorness. By utilizing these images, Parker is capable of doing the

reader to experience many emotions and forces the reader to oppugn his or her ain

stereotypes of the hapless. With the usage of connotative linguistic communication and the ability

to elicit emotion, Parker successfully compels the reader to analyze his or her

ideas and beliefs on who the hapless are.

Parker & # 8217 ; s usage of connotative linguistic communication causes the reader to experience many

emotions. Of these emotions, a outstanding one is guilt. Parker is capable of

doing the reader experience guilty for the ownerships that he or she has. For

illustration, she uses the phrase & # 8220 ; You say in your clean apparels coming from your

clean house, & # 8230 ; & # 8221 ; ( Parker 237 ) . This causes the reader to experience guilty for holding

the chance to be clean when we all know that she doesn & # 8217 ; t have the same.

She calls hot H2O a & # 8220 ; luxury & # 8221 ; ( Parker 237 ) . To those populating in poorness hot

H2O is a luxury. The unimpoverished return it for granted and ne’er before

considered it anything other than a basic ownership. When the reader hears

that person else calls it a luxury that they can non afford, he or she can & # 8217 ; T

aid but experience guilty for holding it as a basic ownership. Parker besides attacks

the guilt of the reader through narratives of her kids. She knows that some

readers may non experience guilty for things that happen to her, but when kids are

introduced to the state of affairs they will experience more guilt. She says, & # 8220 ; My kids

have no excess books, no magazines, no excess pencils, or crayons, or

paper & # 8230 ; & # 8221 ; ( Parker 238 ) . The reader can non assist but experience guilty for holding these

basic things when her kids, who need them, make non. Another thing that

Parker makes the audience experience guilty for holding is wellness. She says, speaking

about her kids, & # 8220 ; & # 8230 ; most of import of all, they do non hold health. & # 8221 ; ( Parker

238 ) . She goes on farther to depict what is incorrect with them. Parker says,

& # 8220 ; They have worms, they have infections, they have pink-eye all summer & # 8221 ; ( 238 ) .

These descriptions of her kids cause the reader to experience atrocious for them.

By doing the reader experience this manner she is increasing the degree of guilt the

reader besides feels. She is really successful in carry throughing this and this

success causes her statement to go really powerful.

Not merely does she do us experience guilty for holding ownerships that she

can non, but Parker besides makes us experience guilty about the stereotypes we hold. She

knows what society & # 8217 ; s stereotypes are and she successfully combats them. Parker

knows that society thinks the hapless Don & # 8217 ; t want to work. To assail this she tells

of why she can & # 8217 ; t work. She has three kids. The last clip she had a occupation the

baby-sitter she left them with did non take attention of them. She returned to happen

all three in unsafe state of affairss. Her babe had non been changed since she had

left it at that place, her other was playing with a piece of crisp glass, and her oldest

was playing entirely at the border of a lake ( Parker 236-237 ) . Her opportunities of

happening a better baby-sitter are slender because she can non afford a nursery school

due to fact that she makes excessively small ( Parker 237 ) . This is why she can non work.

Her inability to work leads to many of the other stereotypes that society has

of the hapless. Society inquiries why the hapless can non be clean. She tells of how

without money she can non afford any cleansing supplies ( Parker 237 ) . Parker

Tells of how she saved for two months to purchase a jar of Vaseline and when she had

eventually saved plenty the monetary value had gone up two cents ( 237 ) . She can non rinse in

soap because it has to be saved to clean the babe & # 8217 ; s nappies ( Parker 237 ) . She

efficaciously shows how society & # 8217 ; s stereotypes are wrong. She is capable of

doing the reader experience guilty for the stereotypes and causes the reader to

inquiry why he or she has them. If the audience would merely take a small clip

to seek and understand her state of affairs they would cognize how baseless the

stereotypes are.

Parker is besides successful in arousing understanding from the reader. She uses

connotative linguistic communication to make distressing images of what poorness is. For

illustration, she calls poorness an & # 8220 ; acid that trickles on pride until pride is worn off

( Parker 239 ) . & # 8221 ; Not merely is poverty bad but it is an acid. An acid is a

atrocious thing. It burns and corrodes off at something until it no longer

exists. By this concluding poorness is destructing her life. This phrase forces

the reader to see poorness as something worse than they had of all time thought

before. She shows poorness as a expletive, as a & # 8220 ; chisel that french friess on award until

award is worn off ( Parker 239 ) . & # 8221 ; Parker starts about every paragraph with a

new definition of what poorness is. Some illustrations are: & # 8221 ; poorness is being tired & # 8221 ;

( Parker 236 ) , & # 8220 ; poorness is ungraded & # 8221 ; ( 237 ) , & # 8220 ; poorness is inquiring for aid & # 8221 ; ( 237 ) , and

& # 8220 ; poorness is looking into a black hereafter & # 8221 ; ( 238 ) . All of these phrases create a

different image of poorness and each one is a success in arousing understanding from

the reader. They all force the reader to conceive of poorness in a new manner. We all

knew it was bad but Parker makes us recognize how black poorness is. She shows us

that there is no hope for the hapless without understanding.

Parker is successful in acquiring her point across with her usage of

connotative linguistic communication and her ability to make images. She has done a good occupation

of assailing the reader and acquiring him or her to listen to what she has to state.

Even though she attacks the audience she does it in an appropriate manner whereas

she does non come across as violative. All in all, Parker has done a successful

occupation at making images and utilizing the readers & # 8217 ; emotion to acquire an audience to

listen to her predicament and the battles of other & # 8217 ; s in her state of affairs.

A limited
time offer!
Get authentic custom
ESSAY SAMPLEwritten strictly according
to your requirements