English HL Commentary – Too Many Names – Pablo Neruda
We will write a custom essay sample
on English HL Commentary – Too Many Names – Pablo Neruda or any similar
topic specifically for you
The poem ” Too Many Names” by Pablo Neruda written uses several poetic devices , including metaphors, anaphoras and asyndeton light on one of the ideas the poet to shed light back into communist political opinion. It is the idea of equality and equal worth of each human being , with such names as a method to this claim that names are of no use to explain.
While the poem ( including the title) , Neruda, his idea of the names of people who are not accented with . This is because ( through the eyes ) change all the same and do not give themselves to each other / our name . The idea , it usually starts in verse two , the use of metaphors people as no different than the ” dust or sand ” or “rain under rain . ” You can not use a piece of sand from another location or you can do the same with raindrops .
He extends the same view in verse two with the declaration that “he” shoots (the first speaker who sometimes switches to the second person speaker) no difference between Venezuela, Chile and Paraguay. He does not recognise this country , he ” knows only the skin of the earth and know that no name ” . He also explains that not too different “in simple terms , or floor / ground. This can also be interpreted as a metaphor for ” the other , already existing borders of the same country skin of the earth skin of the earth ” that the human skin and in this way, countries have names that do not mean anything , such as names of people. ”
Neruda ‘s idea of names have no significance is enhanced when poetic devices are put into operation . The most important literary device that is repeated through out different parts of the poem is the metaphor of time . This metaphor makes his entrance in the order 1 ,
Page 2 English HL Commentary – Too Many Names – Pablo Neruda Essay
2, 3 and 4 of the first stanza , which means that “the time will not be cut with your weary scissors ,” said ” Mondays Tuesdays with engaging ,” says . Within the metaphor of time explains the metaphor of ” shears tired ” that this might not cut it when we separate days with nights makes no sense to want to, because time is a continuous thing.
The same idea occurs again in verse four , but a metaphor of seasons is used , says: ” Ferry that goes all winter – Time lost its shoes . ” , Explaining that we do not just cut the year in days , but also in the seasons , which also run into each other , such as ” Monday and Tuesday,” almost as if “Time lost its shoes . ” . The whole metaphor of time and the imagery of the ” tired scissors ” will suggest that we use to cut our uniformed society or to separate , in the same way we cut even took us time .
Another important poetry apparatus using Anderson anaphora ‘ s. The first example of the beginning of the line is 3 and 4 of verse two , repeats the words ” for all of us ,” stressed that society sees as Neruda . This becomes clear when we look back three and four at the end of the line, where the metaphors of people as ” dust or sand ” and ” rain ” .
As we discussed before so look at the two lines , as some typical Chilean Neruda names such as ” Pedro “, ” Pink ” and ” Maria ,” the poet uses to explain that this was not noticed. Again, the improvement in the clarity of the poet is shown intentions of anaphora that we were careful not to cut uniform on our society. The second time an anaphora occurs at the end of the sixth stanza now repeat “with many ” times “with many ” twice after that. What are the three phrases repeated all have in common , along with the title , is that they are “all”, ” many ” and many ” explains all focus on Neruda ‘s idea of society as a large number, the words that people to be one thing, but a part of ” many ” people. ‘s interesting that the structure along the side of this anaphora developed ‘ s, placed symmetrically in the poem , when the idea of the poem folded in two . said first set at the beginning controlled the second verse and the other was at the end of the second to the last verse , suggesting that their application to retain as an introduction and conclusion for the poem for the reader in mind some idea Neruda.
The last compelling poetic device is an asyndeton found along the side of the last sentence anaphora in verse six . The poets are synonyms for the word “name” for the purpose of mocking their use , such as ” sad formalities ” or ” pompous letters”.
Pablo Neruda was in Chile in 1958 , when he wrote this . The exact year in which Chile canceled the law of defense of democracy . To the idea of the people who are part of a unified society are recurring emphasis and use any name reflects , clearly re-focus on his vision of communism. The fact that the Chilean Communist activity was written during this poem was written could very well have influenced or inspired the writing of this piece. This can be observed in the tone of his writing , seems very passionate about his views through the whole poem , repeating the proof of his ideas , as in the anaphora ‘ s, non-Communists may slightly pessimistic atmosphere creation.
Finally, the idea of poets name is not determine the personality , nor the ability to ” cut ” or remove a component represented by a single company clearly by the metaphor of time and with the use of repetition in the form of anaphora ‘ s . It is also not difficult to see that it can be a passionate communist undertone to the message behind the poem , but the mood of pessimism very differently to the mind of the reader or advice.See More on Literature