Geoffrey Chaucer Essay Research Paper Canterbury TalesAaron

8 August 2017

Geoffrey Chaucer Essay, Research Paper

Canterbury Narratives

Aaron Talton

In Canterbury Tales, Chaucer uses the Pardoner and the Prioress to subtlety expose what he thinks of the church. The Prioress is after the attending of work forces. The Pardoner is after money. Chaucer shows the corruptness and lip service integrated into the spiritual society at the clip of the narrative. He saw the spiritual society as a corrupt society.

The Prioress is a nun that seems to be infatuated with how she appears romantically and physically towards males. ? She was known as Madame Eglantine. ? Madame Eglantine was a Gallic lady that was really much associated with romantics. She was really dainty and proper. ? From her lips no morsel of all time fell. ? This could be interpreted that she is the caput of her compact and she wants to stand for it good because it would be instead ill-mannered if she did hold bad table manners. But I think that she was more interested in being gracious and beautiful than being a good representation of her compact. She besides wore a rosary around her weaponries with little coral beads and from them hung a broach of aureate shininess. The manner of twenty-four hours in the secular universe was this brooch manner. This confers more that she was after secular things and this does non travel along with her supposed beliefs.

The corruptness is shown through the forgiver besides. The forgiver was a priest who gave out forgivenesss for wickedness. In that clip some it was common pattern to give money for forgiveness of wickedness. What the forgiver was after was money, non the economy of psyches or the improvement of society, money. He is purportedly a adult male of God yet he is highly avaricious and takes advantage of people? s wickednesss. The Pardoner was really good at what he did. One of his fast ones was about like an Indian medical specialty adult male. He had a shoulder bone, purportedly owned by a holy Jew, he told people that if they dipped the bone in the well and one of their animate beings became ill? take H2O from the well and rinse its lingua and it is healed at once. ? Besides he went on to construct this up even more stating his audience to? cook the H2O from the well and you will lose your green-eyed monster for your wife. ? He stated that utilizing this H2O would besides increase your productiveness in your Fieldss. But o the last line of his address? provided that he convey his penny or so to do his offering? brings it back into existent life. This reflects what I believe were Chaucer? s ideas of the fourteenth century spiritual nobility. Their absolute privation of money and they stoop to whatever degree to make it.

? Chaucer seems to connote that one manner of looking at the faith of this clip is to propose that it is driven by a selfish demand for addition and wages? ( Ashton 89 ) . The Pa

rdoner, and the church on whose behalf he acts, is motivated strictly by fiscal greed. He uses a rhetorical scope of fast ones to pull strings his audience to bring on a sense of guilt into them. The craft and clever Pardoner so would spread out on his subject, to intensify the guilt, to fix for the existent purpose of his narrative, which was

non prophesy against the wickednesss nominated at start but to carry his hearers to portion with their money. One manner in which he does this is by inquiring his hearers if they have done something so atrocious that they would be scared to travel to the confessional and confess it. He so states that he can? ? do the people free in giving pennies-especially to me. ? The Pardoner besides uses visuals to assist him carry through this. He stands in the dais and? I nod and peer about like a dove perched on a shed? , the dove being like Christ and doing him associated with a Christ like figure. The Pardoner takes advantage once more of the fact that faith mingles with superstitious notion, and is frequently dependent upon ocular or concrete grounds. Therefore he offers a thaumaturgy? bone? to vouch God? s strength to better they? rhenium crop. Peoples would look happy to pay anything in warrant of a good crop significance no famishment for his household. The Pardoner besides manipulates his audience by stating them that if they come up give an offering they will be saved from their wickednesss. Once once more everyone would be happy to hold the warrant that they saved from their wickednesss merely to pay a little fee.

The Pardoner and the Prioress reflects what Chaucer thinks about the church at the clip. He thinks that it is corrupt and highly hypocritical. The church will halt at nil to acquire precisely what they want, money. And even the holy adult females are can non maintain their lecherousnesss under control. The Pardoner is really good at pull stringsing people. He plays people? s frights of traveling to hell off on them by stating them the lone manner that they can is by giving money to him for a forgiveness of their wickednesss. The Pardoner presents could be compared to a Television revivalist. One of the cats who are inquiring for money and parts and that if you do God will bless you. Yet it still works today and people

still make believe that God will bless their money because a adult male the Television said it would. So it is non that hard to believe that the Pardoner could dope all those people into doing them give offering for the same fact of prosperity.


Plants Citied

Ashton, Gail. Chaucer. New York: St. Martin? s Press, 1998.

Boyd, Beverly. Variorum Editions of Geoffrey Chaucer. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1987.

Payne, Robert O. Geoffrey Chaucer. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1986.

How to cite Geoffrey Chaucer Essay Research Paper Canterbury TalesAaron essay

Choose cite format:
Geoffrey Chaucer Essay Research Paper Canterbury TalesAaron. (2017, Aug 25). Retrieved January 9, 2021, from
A limited
time offer!
Save Time On Research and Writing. Hire a Professional to Get Your 100% Plagiarism Free Paper