Hey Big Spenders Essay Research Paper Hey

9 September 2017

Hey, Big Spenders Essay, Research Paper

Hey, Big Spenders Tara Joyce The President of the United States makes $ 200 000 a twelvemonth. A Supreme Court justness gets $ 170 000. The mean one-year American family income is $ 34 076. And Steven Segal? He makes $ 10 million per image. We want famous persons to be like us, and so we don & # 8217 ; t. We want them to populate a universe of glamor, but we don & # 8217 ; t want them to be stuck up. We want to stare at their large faces on the screen, yet it & # 8217 ; s our ain self-love we are feeding. Yet one thing & # 8217 ; s for certain & # 8211 ; we don & # 8217 ; Ts like to hear about them doing $ 10 million for icky films. For the most portion, famous persons are non deserving their tremendous payroll checks. Not merely is it a pathetic monetary value to pay person to stand in forepart of a camera but it has negative effects on the remainder of the amusement concern. Due to the salary additions, production monetary values are lifting, quality is take downing, and it is going progressively harder for a telecasting show or film to go a hit. Making money at the films is debatable, though studios one time thought star power was a surefire manner to have boffo box-office returns. These yearss star power is limited, and frequently meaningless, unless the movie strikes a nervus with audiences. & # 8220 ; There & # 8217 ; s no justification for any of these high wages unless you get the histrion in a movie with a terrific thought, & # 8221 ; said an anon. studio executive. & # 8220 ; Look at Mr. Holland & # 8217 ; s Opus. The movie was inexpensive. Richard Dreyfuss is no longer a star. But the thought counted. & # 8221 ; Yet studios continue to blast out for these large names, detonating the current monetary value ticket for the mean studio movie, including selling and distribution to $ 60 million. The same is true for telecasting plans such as Mad About You and The Simpsons. Helen Hunt and Paul Reiser, the stars of Mad About You demanded $ 1 million per episode this season ( that & # 8217 ; s a $ 750 000 rise for both ) and got it, raising their licence fees 100 per centum, to about $ 3 million. However, Mad About You is no ER, Seinfeld, or even Friends, the situation comedy has ne’er been a large hit and now in its 6th twelvemonth its evaluations are on the diminution. There is besides the instance of the voices from The Simpsons demanding $ 150 000 per episode for merely a two- day-a-week occupation. Of class, non everyone is being greedy. A few pricey histrions ( Stallone in Copland, Hanks in Forrest Gump ) have been trying to maintain budgets low by waiving immense upfront payments in exchange for a piece of the net incomes. Recognize though that it is non merely merely a smattering of histrions who are having these hyperbolic payroll checks. As A-list histrions wages raise, in bend th wage graduated table for second-tier stars do excessively. Suddenly, a buddy like Tom Arnold is doing $ 1.5 million a film. Though non everyone in Hollywood & # 8217 ; s wage has gone up. & # 8220 ; The middle- category working professional histrion in this industry is acquiring squeezed, & # 8221 ; says the Screen Actors Guild & # 8217 ; s president, Richard Masur. & # 8220 ; The top degrees are sucking all the money up, and everybody else is jammed in at the underside. If it continues, it will destruct the on the job bosom of the business. & # 8221 ; It may be taking the bosom out of the concern but it is besides impacting the quality of the movi

Es being made. Movies used to be made when the stuff was ready to be produced. Today the studios are greenlighting a film every bit shortly as they can lure a pavilion histrion and a good quality manager. That is all the proof a studio needs, whether or non the film is ready to be made. Though when a good book does come around studios are left with fewer resources to finance mid-range films with grownup subjects, clever authorship and realistic love affair. It is no surprise that at last old ages Oscars, major Hollywood films and stars were virtually shut out ( Jerry Maguire was the lone studio movie nominated for best image amid a slate of independently produced critical favourites – The English Patient, Fargo, Secrets & Lies and Shine ) . There is besides another job that is non precisely a new but has gotten worse in recent old ages, stars rewriting their lines. “When stars start drawing in these unbelievable $ 20 million wages, it gave them a sense of entitlement, ” observed Hollywood author Budd Schilberg. “They think they can make anything now-act, write, alter the duologue, whatever.” Needless to state, a batch of film stars are non the greatest authors in the world-or even really good readers-and the consequences of their tampering are rarely attractive. Take for illustration, the film update of the authoritative novel Great Expectations, actor-turned-writer Ethan Hawke took is upon to compose his ain new duologue and the turnout from that undertaking? Let’s merely say that it won’t be winning any Academy Awards this twelvemonth or of all time. Having A-list histrions in telecasting shows and films is the studios’ thought of an insurance policy, vouching boffo box office and Nielsen evaluations. There is a defect to this logic though, large stars bomb all the clip. Recently, the former Magnum P.I. , Tom Selleck was paid $ 150 000 to star in The Closer because he was a familiar Television face. The show was cancelled this hebdomad due to low evaluations. And Bette Midler who has no TV-series experience is said to desire dual that. “Star vehicles have no higher success rate than other shows, ” says Rich Frank, caput of production company C3. “In a universe of jumble, the cyberspaces think anyone recognizable will convey viewers.” This is the same in the universe of Sylvester Stallone and Demi Moore, both have the top wages in their Fieldss and neither have had a hit in at least five old ages. Yet they continue to have the large vaulting horses due to the studios vain hope that the name will pull people to purchase tickets and as it stands now, merely 30 per centum of Hollywood films of all time make money.

Some insiders insist that the position quo merely can non go on. Sooner or subsequently, they predict, a salary clang is inevitable. & # 8220 ; They & # 8217 ; re traveling to hit the wall, & # 8221 ; says manufacturer Albert Ruddy. & # 8220 ; It & # 8217 ; s got to go on in the close hereafter. It gets to be impractical at a certain point. & # 8221 ; Until so, studios will go on to blast out the large vaulting horses to stars they see as insurance policies that guarantee box office draw and high Nielsen evaluations. Comedian Sandra Bernhard summarizes our feelings best when she said, & # 8220 ; It & # 8217 ; s out of control, inflated, bloated, and grotesque but I wouldn & # 8217 ; t mind doing a million for making a film myself. & # 8221 ;

How to cite Hey Big Spenders Essay Research Paper Hey essay

Choose cite format:
Hey Big Spenders Essay Research Paper Hey. (2017, Sep 07). Retrieved January 8, 2021, from https://newyorkessays.com/essay-hey-big-spenders-essay-research-paper-hey-essay/
A limited
time offer!
Save Time On Research and Writing. Hire a Professional to Get Your 100% Plagiarism Free Paper