Hypothesis Identification Article Analysis Paper

1 January 2017

In many environments in which peers are placed together for long periods of time, it seems that banding together and ostracizing the people who are different. This is apparent in classrooms around the world where bullying runs rampant. In this article examiners try to determine “the relation between moral disengagement and different- self reported and peer nominated positions in school bullying” (Obermann, 2011, Para one).

The hypothesis of this study was to investigate the moral standing of the children accused of bullying and the children who were the recipients of the act of bullying. They also wanted to determine the levels of disengagement that bullies, their victims, and children who were not engaged in or a recipient of an act of bullying. In order to determine these answers, the researchers surveyed a group of sixth and seventh graders. The researchers used a Danish moral disengagement scale to analyze the data gathered and to see if there were major discrepancies.

The hypothesis and its ensuing research yielded data that was startling. It showed based on the information and data gathered that both pure bullies and bully victims, displayed a higher moral disengagement than the children who were not bullies or victims of bullying, as seen in the following chart: Aggressive Behavior, Mar/Apr2011, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p133-144, 12p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts Diagram; found on p134 These finding show that people who were bullies or were bully victims have less of an understanding of what is right and wrong.

Therefore, they were capable of repeating the action or perpetuating the bullying cycle by doing it to other students. These results also showed that self-reported bullying and peer reported bullying had an impact on the child’s social reputation and that regard for such reputation had a stronger association with the moral disengagement. This study also yields results that indicate current beliefs that bullying is more common among boys than girls. This is seen by examining the sample set at a more in- depth level and developing a mean and a standard deviation of the sample set of school students.

The results are evident in the ensuing chart: Aggressive Behavior, Mar/Apr2011, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p133-144, 12p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts Chart; found on p140 These results reflect that in the four categories made from the sample set which the mean of the incidents show the instances that boys are the sex that suffer with the most acts of bullying. The data that was collected and the hypothesis of the research were proven through this data and the ensuing experiment.

The findings were conclusive that the connection between bullying and moral disengagement were there in both the cases of bullies and bully victims, and in the instance of peer nominated bullying activities and self-reported bullying and victimization. The hypothesis was accepted under conditions that more experiments and research be conducted and well as the importance of better theory development.

How to cite Hypothesis Identification Article Analysis Paper essay

Choose cite format:
Hypothesis Identification Article Analysis Paper. (2017, Jan 15). Retrieved May 31, 2020, from https://newyorkessays.com/essay-hypothesis-identification-article-analysis-paper/
A limited
time offer!
Save Time On Research and Writing. Hire a Professional to Get Your 100% Plagiarism Free Paper