Leibniz and Locke: Phenomenology Vs. Mechanism

4 April 2015
Examines the philosophy of the mind of late Enlightenment philosophers John Locke and G.W. Leibniz. Focuses on the role each had in the development of the modern science of psychology.

Since early psychology there have been differing viewpoints on how the mind works and how to go about studying it. One of these debates began almost alongside the founding of psychology by Rene Descartes. This debate exists between those who feel that the mind is separate from the body and should be studied through the description of immediate experience and those who believe that the body functions should be studied so that they may shed light on the workings of the mind. This is essentially the debate of the phenomenological approach versus the mechanistic approach (Watson, 1963, 162). The theories of two of the earliest psychologists are examined along with their influences on contemporary psychology and their implications for research and practice.

We will write a custom essay sample on
Leibniz and Locke: Phenomenology Vs. Mechanism
or any similar topic specifically for you
Do Not Waste
Your Time

Only $13.90 / page

An early supporter of the phenomenological approach would be …

How to cite this essay

Choose cite format:
Leibniz and Locke: Phenomenology Vs. Mechanism. (2015, Apr 23). Retrieved December 6, 2019, from https://newyorkessays.com/essay-leibniz-and-locke-phenomenology-vs-mechanism/
A limited
time offer!
Get authentic custom
ESSAY SAMPLEwritten strictly according
to your requirements