Scholarly Writing Skills
Scholarly writing is known to be a type Of categorized writing and not superior to journalism or fiction. There are expectations, traditions and values that must be adhered to in this style of writing. According to Watson (201 0), experts in a particular field write articles using scholarly writing. These articles have a primary audience in the field of study.
Hence, scholarly articles are written in a more advanced and refined manner than general writings. Scholarly writing is known to have an objective stance, which states the significance of a well-organized topic.The article is detailed effectively and provides for reproduction by other scholars with the same results (Para. 2). Learning what scholarly writing is and implementing guidelines of this style of writing will enable a scholar-practitioner to create successful articles personally and professionally. Analysis of Scholarly Writing The author’s paragraph contains certain strengths and weaknesses in terms of appropriateness, bias, opinion, quality of evidence, and scholarly writing. Initially, the paragraph lacks an explanation of a specific purpose for the topic of discussion.
The author writes a brief synopsis regarding the availability of computers, based mostly on personal opinion. Only one source was quoted, which inferred a certain percentage of high school students used computers. This does not allot for any other category of society, which limits the ability to develop a proper theory. According to Crank, Lund, Steele and Meyers (2004), based on a scholarly atmosphere, noteworthy issues have been studied numerous times. Revisiting important areas, based on the analysis, theory and viewpoint is essential to quality scholarly writing.Repeating previously published information does not improve the body of knowledge (p. 9).
The author does not offer an objective tone and appears to be repeating information read or heard by a certain source. The audience may not perceive the information as factual research, but merely a rehashing of previously published or verbally expressed information. Critical-type readers will examine evidence to prove the validity of information. It is important for a scholar-practitioner to consider scholarly writing consisting of researched- based evidence, and void of other individual opinions.The author does not use specific techniques such as counter-arguing comparing evaluating or extracting an analytical conclusion in the paragraph of information. The paragraph would most likely fail to persuade a critical- type reader to believe the information is accurate, current and trustworthy. The author must learn to become a critical-thinker, when collecting data for this and any other article.
Assertions must be stated clearly and concisely with solid, objective evidence. The information given does not properly inform, engage or persuade the audience firmly to believe the significance of arsenal computers.Quite frankly, technological can be a tedious subject, so it is the responsibility of the author to present interesting factual evidence to inform and persuade the audience. The author states an opinion regarding poverty-stricken individuals can save enough money these days to buy a computer. There is no researched-based evidence supporting whether or not poverty-stricken individuals can save enough money to buy a computer, nor if this category of individuals have a true need for a computer. In conclusion, the author did not show valid, factual evidence to confirm the Roth or use of personal computers.