Should the United States Ratify the International Court Treaty?
An examination of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its potential benefit to American interests.
The paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its potential benefit to the United States, as well as to the remainder of the international community. The paper criticizes the Bush administration’s opposition to the treaty, as it explains the faults of arguments raised by the ICC’s opponents.
“The prosecution of the most ruthless war criminals, it is widely agreed, is a worthy goal that all nations should pursue. A universal court, it seems, is based on the assumption that the prosecution of such abhorrent war criminals supersedes the value of national sovereignty, as all nations should be able to agree on crimes that are incompatible with the values of any civilization, nation-state, or any other tribal association. But during the years of the Cold War and the de-colonization processes reaching such a universally binding goal was not possible; with the end of the Cold War, the movement towards the creation of an international court began (Carter & Jackson 2002). While the crimes that the court should address are generally agreed on, other issues such as its effect on states’ citizens throughout the globe turned out to be an obstacle that induced the United States, as well as a handful of other states, to oppose the jurisdiction of the court. While the US has legitimate concerns vis-a-vis the ICC, it is an imperative that American policymakers support the vision of a universal court and eventually act to ratify the American support.”
How to cite Should the United States Ratify the International Court Treaty? essay
Choose cite format:
Should the United States Ratify the International Court Treaty?. (2015, Apr 23). Retrieved September 24, 2020, from https://newyorkessays.com/essay-should-the-united-states-ratify-the-international-court-treaty/