Should U.S. Bombs Police the World?
A look at the U.S. foreign policy and the extent of its justification.
Don’t waste time
Get a verified expert to help you with Should U.S. Bombs Police the World?
$35.80 for a 2-page paper
This paper presents a brief examination of American foreign policy from the Vietnam War to the bombardment of Cambodia, the Gulf War and the economic sanctions on Iraq as well as the present war against bin-La din’s al-Qaida in Afghanistan.
The greatest purveyor of violence in the world today is my own government, said Martin Luther King in 1967. King’s premise is presently shared by many, in the United States and elsewhere, who believe that the US is the “evil empire” of the second half of the 20th century. While the current American offensive is justified by many throughout the political spectrum. The Nation’s Richard Falk maintains that The war in Afghanistan against apocalyptic terrorism is the first truly just war since World War II others argue that the bombardment is merely another example of the violent, disdainful nature of America’s foreign policy. The American intervention in WWII, of course, is widely regarded as a necessary contribution to the containment of the expansionist Nazi aggressors. Not too many people repudiate the legitimacy of that war, the mere existence of various non-white ethnic groups throughout the world is enough to dispel any counter notions. In retrospect, most people agree that the US would have saved the life of millions had it recognized the nature of the enemy sooner, and thus joined the war earlier.