South Carolina Exposition and Protest
Calhoun, then vice president under John Quince Adams and later under Andrew Jackson The document was a rotes against the Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations. The document stated that if the tariff was not repealed, South Carolina would secede The South Carolina Protest was issued by the South Carolina legislature in 1828 to announce its intention to nullify the federal tariff of 1828. The Exposition explained and defended the principles and customs upon which the Protest and nullification rested.Calhoun argued against the Tariff of 1828, which imposed a tax on imported goods high enough to protect domestic producers from foreign competition. Northern manufacturers benefited from the tax, while Southern planters who depended on international trade suffered. Calhoun argued that a protective tariff was unconstitutional, and that states, not the Supreme Court, were the rightful judges of the constitutionality of laws.
I think the southern states had a reason to be upset, but no government is perfect and sometimes you have to adjust your personal opinions for the good of the country.The tariff that was put in place, The Tariff of 1 828 was passed by the congress of the Lignite States on May 19 1828. It was designed to protect industry in the northern United States. Something that benefits just some people and not others will cause immediate installment, which it did in the south. They were upset that they would be paying money that was going to help the north and not them. The goal of this tariffs to help protect the northern states that were being driven out of business by lower prices importer goods.A tax in place WOUld help them.
Only $13.90 / page
In the south though, they had to pay higher prices on imported goods and reducing the exportation of British goods to the U. S. Made it difficult got British to pay for the cotton they imported. William James Cooper, an American educator who revered as US Commissioner of Education stated that, “Protective tariff violated their constitutional theory, for, as they interpreted the document, it gave no permission for a protective tariff.Moreover, they saw protection as benefiting the North and hurting the In the Exposition and Protest reported by the special committee of the House of Representatives they explain that the tariff is, ” a violation of these fundamental principles, a breach of a well-defined tryst and a prevention of the humble power vested in the federal government for federal purposes only. ” Also the south implanted that the tariff would disrupt farming and would cause people to emigrate elsewhere.