Strong National Government vs. Strong State Government
Does a strong federal government really benefit us, the people, as much as people say it does? A strong federal government compared to a strong local or state government is one of the major topics out there. Are you for a strong central government? A government where one man has the authority to wage wars? In reality studies show that a strong local government benefits the people more than officials would like you to know.
In the end, it really doesn’t matter, but in reality, every power that the state government has the federal government has it and vice versa. Strong state governments are great because any concern that is brought up in a small meeting is usually immediately taken into consideration. Because not every state require the same thing, have same values, and populations, local governments benefit in that they are able to set new laws that they will benefit from, whereas if it was implemented as a nation, some states may have problems with this new law.
Strong National Government vs. Strong State Government Essay Example
If a strong state government were implemented, state governments would be allowed to create new laws. Creating new laws take a very long time. This is because it has to go through many tiring and tedious processes. If state governments had the authority to implement laws, they would be able to implement laws almost immediately without having to get the consent of the federal government. State governments can listen to their citizens better than a federal government where one voice is hard to be heard. Usually whenever something needs to be heard, but isn’t heard, a poll is taken to judge how important the given issue is.
If a strong state government is implemented, these issues will almost immediately be taken care of. With a strong state government people will be able to decide the kind of lives they want t olive. Whether it be rights to bear arms or the making the legal driving age to 18. These people can choose states with restrictions. Families and individuals will not be able to consider the options of how they will live with a strong national government because it will limit their choices. My last point is that a strong federal government will only weaken the country.
If the federal government makes a mistake and passes a law that doesn’t really benefit the people, it will only make things worse for that country. And if this were the case for a state government, things like this would not affect neighboring states and only the state that had passed the law. Meaning that it would not bring down the whole nation but just a small part of it. Federal laws affect an entire country. Passing some laws will only affect people who had nothing to do with it. Its like a class where one student made a huge ruckus and the entire class is given extra work because of one student who just so happen to get some attention.
This would apply to the event that occurred in Connecticut. We were very well aware of the fact that guns were easily accessible. Shootings occur everyday in every major city in America. Many people are using this event to promote the tightening of gun laws. This affects the huge population of people who had nothing to do with this situation besides having purchased a gun. Lastly, strong state governments are much better than federal governments. A strong state government thinks about the people whereas a strong federal government thinks about the country as a whole and estimates people.