Supervision and Evaluation in the Education System

4 April 2015
A personal philosophy on the ideas of supervising and evaluating trainee teachers.

The paper explores the supervision process of trainee teachers within the education system and the merits of evaluation of these trainees. It compares formative and summative evaluation, pointing out the advantages and disadvantages of each. It concludes by proposing a combination of formative and summative evaluation as the most effective method.
“The basic purpose of evaluation is to assess whether the person is capable of doing the job, or to judge whether “an individual is fit to practice a profession autonomously” (McGaghie 5). This evaluation is important based on the responsibility the individual will have. There needs to be a system that does ensure they are capable of doing the job without supervision. However, I think it is also true that an individual does not always know instinctively how to act in professional situations. There is a major difference between learning the profession in a classroom setting and actually performing the role of the profession. This evaluation process then can be best used if it is not just a process of watching the individual and assessing them, but also a process of guiding and advising them. In this way it becomes on-the-job training and the individual can use this time to perfect their approach and learn as much as possible.”

How to cite Supervision and Evaluation in the Education System essay

Choose cite format:
Supervision and Evaluation in the Education System. (2015, Apr 23). Retrieved September 26, 2020, from
A limited
time offer!
Save Time On Research and Writing. Hire a Professional to Get Your 100% Plagiarism Free Paper