Taoism Vs Christianity Essay Research Paper THE
Taoism Vs. Christianity Essay, Research Paper
THE WAY TO IMMORTALITY
A Comparison Between Taoism and Christianity and
the Paths They Take to Reach Immortality
By: Emily Capaldi
The basic construction of both Taoism and Christianity
are parallel because they work to achieve the same end.
It is evident in both faiths that by following a
pure way, and devoiding 1s ego of earthly aspirations,
wealth, and desires, one may make the ultimate end of
immortality. But the manner in which 1 reaches this end
is really different. Both faiths believe in an entity
that has existed before the existence, is the Godhead of
all things, and loves and provides for all of creative activity.
The Taoist believes in Tao, which remains a? formless? ,
religious stare of head. It rejects names and is
hence? nameless? and unable to be spoken.
Christians, nevertheless, believe in God, which takes on an
active human signifier and is spoken as? the word? of God.
However, it is the differences between Tao and God that
present the most apparent factors that separate Taoism
from Christianity. Unlike the Tao, God regulations as a
supreme being, while the Tao is at one with all, and
does non get the hang over anything. It is obvious that
immortality is the end in both faiths, but the
Taoist construct of immortality, and the manner in which they
go immortal differs from the of the Christians.
Immortality, to the Taoist, is to accomplish Tao, going
at one with the existence. Christian immortality is to
range Eden, and walk along side God. Besides, the Taoist
must follow an single way, that comes from within.
While a Christian may make heaven merely by Acts of the Apostless of
his/her ain goodness in conformity with their
relationship with God.
Creation, in both Taoism and Christianity, is
stemmed from a beginning that ever was and ever will
be. Taoists base their beliefs around the Tao, and the
Christians believe in God. However, the kernel of
these two separate thoughts differ dramatically in many
other facets. Unlike Tao, which claims to be
? formless? , God takes on an existent signifier, the image of
adult male. The really first sentence of John? s Gospel provinces,
? In the beginning was the 1 who was called the
word & # 8230 ; ? This statement confirms the being of a
individual being. Subsequently in the text it is said that? the
word became flesh and dwelt among us? , therefore going
like a human. In contrast, the great Tao is? infinite? ;
it flows everyplace and is ever present, yet it can non
be seen or touched. It is? empty like a bowl? and
? bottomless? yet its capacity can non be exhausted. The
Tao? s ain intangibleness demonstrates the impression that it
is frameless and hence is non constructed into any
form or signifier.
While address and understanding remain the footing for
following Christianity, the Tao can non be spoken, and
hence can ne’er be to the full explained in words.
Harmonizing to the Gospel of John, in the Christian Bible,
God sent John down to earth to talk? the word? and take
the people to hold religion. In order for Christians to
get an apprehension of their religion, they must
have some signifier of learning or direction.
Christians go to church to hear? the word? that is
verbally preached to them through the words of a priest,
who acts as a retainer to God. With this being
understood it can be concluded that without linguistic communication, as
the footing for understanding, Christianity could non
exist. Taoism, on the other manus, emphasizes the fact
that it is mute and hence can ne’er be verbally
told or explained. Tao is described as being
? nameless? . It is exceeds beyond verbal communicating
and comprehension. ? Wordss can be used to talk of it,
but they can non be used to incorporate it. ?
Both Tao and God love and take attention of all of
creative activity. Every populating thing depends on them for life.
But the Tao is non a supreme being as God is to the
Christians because Taoism is non monotheistic. The chief
focal point in Taoism is non the worship of one God, but
alternatively coming into harmoniousness with Tao. Tao? apparels and
provenders all things but does non claim to be maestro over
them. ? Therefore he says, ? the existence and I exist together,
and all things and I are one. ? God, on the other manus,
bases above the existence a
s a higher being. He regulations
by power, puting certain criterions which Christians are
to populate by and obey in order to make redemption. The Ten
Commandments, besides known as? the jurisprudence of adult male? , are a set
of regulations, developed by God, that people are to stay by
in order to avoid error.
Another component that separates the Tao from God is
the manner in which they guide the universe. It is through
Supreme beings ain actions that Christians are guided, whereas Tao
regulations by non moving. God wagess those who lead a
virtuous life and punishes those who have sinned in
order to learn them the right manner to populate. Tao does non
rule the universe with force, ? it constantly takes no
action, and yet nil is left undone? .
Whether a individual chooses the way of the Taoist or
of a Christian they are finally taking towards the
same end of immortality. Both faiths believe that
there is an being without terminal, that a individuals psyche
is ageless and hence ne’er dies. In fact the psyche,
in both Taoism and Christianity, migrates to another
life where it lives in harmoniousness and cloud nine for all
infinity. But the Taoist thought of immortality greatly
differs from that in Christian beliefs. A Taoist wants
to accomplish Tao, to happen the manner, making a deeper life
where a individuals psyche becomes at one with the existence.
Christians believe that their psyche will populate everlastingly in
peace, one time they reach heaven, a much different province of
immortality than the Tao. Unlike Tao, Heaven is a
physical resettlement of a individuals psyche. When a psyche
ranges heaven it walks along side God, still bing
as a individual being. Person who achieves Tao nevertheless,
becomes at one with nature itself, unifying with all of
being. As stated in the text? Bing one with nature
is to be at one with Tao. ? Reaching Tao is non about a
specific re-location of the psyche as it is with Heaven in
Christianity. Alternatively Tao is about making a new degree
of consciousness which arises when the head and organic structure are
joined together and exceed into a deeper wisdom.
Similarly, in both Taoism and Christianity, one
must hold to follow and un-corruptive life style. If
one is to make either Tao or Heaven, they must avoid
all earthly enticements and desires that may take to the
pollution of a virtuous manner of life. Desires such as
aspiration, celebrity, and selfishness are seen as distractions
to a harmonious life. It is merely when one rids
his/herself of such desires that immortality can be
achieved. Despite these similar standards for ageless
life, the manner in which they follow these waies are
contrasting. A Christian follows a really rigorous set of
philosophies developed by God, and enforced by the church.
It is God itself that guides Christians, and shows them
? the manner? to carry through this end of ageless life.
Without God moving as a leader, Christians would hold no
construct of right from incorrect. In the absence of God? s
way they would non be able to of all time make Eden.
In Taoism, the manner to accomplish Tao is single, it
comes from inside the truster. The significance of Tao is
translated as? the manner? , but this manner can ne’er be
taught. Unlike God, who shows you? the manner? , Tao does
non specify a way for the Taoist, it must come from
within. Taoism? seeks naturalness? , following natures
rules in order to achieve an enlightened and
sceptered entryway into world. The chase of these
types of criterions will guarantee a life of felicity and
repose which far surpasses anything that all of
world? s inventiveness can invent.
It is evident in both Taoism and Christianity that
merely through proper life, by following a pure way,
can one accomplish the ultimate end of immortality. In
both faiths it is possible to keep a pure
life style merely when all desires and personal aspirations
are forsaken along the class of one? s life. However,
it is clear that the differences between the two
faiths far outweigh the similarities. Tao and God,
the two chief entities from each faith, are the
taking factors that divide Taoism and Christianity into
two really stray sets of beliefs. It can be concluded
that the Taoist construct of the immortal hereafter and
the method in which a individual reaches ageless life,
greatly differs from that of the Christian.