Taoism Vs Christianity Essay Research Paper THE

Taoism Vs. Christianity Essay, Research Paper


A Comparison Between Taoism and Christianity and

the Paths They Take to Reach Immortality

By: Emily Capaldi

PH 200

The basic construction of both Taoism and Christianity

are parallel because they work to achieve the same end.

It is evident in both faiths that by following a

pure way, and devoiding 1s ego of earthly aspirations,

wealth, and desires, one may make the ultimate end of

immortality. But the manner in which 1 reaches this end

is really different. Both faiths believe in an entity

that has existed before the existence, is the Godhead of

all things, and loves and provides for all of creative activity.

The Taoist believes in Tao, which remains a? formless? ,

religious stare of head. It rejects names and is

hence? nameless? and unable to be spoken.

Christians, nevertheless, believe in God, which takes on an

active human signifier and is spoken as? the word? of God.

However, it is the differences between Tao and God that

present the most apparent factors that separate Taoism

from Christianity. Unlike the Tao, God regulations as a

supreme being, while the Tao is at one with all, and

does non get the hang over anything. It is obvious that

immortality is the end in both faiths, but the

Taoist construct of immortality, and the manner in which they

go immortal differs from the of the Christians.

Immortality, to the Taoist, is to accomplish Tao, going

at one with the existence. Christian immortality is to

range Eden, and walk along side God. Besides, the Taoist

must follow an single way, that comes from within.

While a Christian may make heaven merely by Acts of the Apostless of

his/her ain goodness in conformity with their

relationship with God.

Creation, in both Taoism and Christianity, is

stemmed from a beginning that ever was and ever will

be. Taoists base their beliefs around the Tao, and the

Christians believe in God. However, the kernel of

these two separate thoughts differ dramatically in many

other facets. Unlike Tao, which claims to be

? formless? , God takes on an existent signifier, the image of

adult male. The really first sentence of John? s Gospel provinces,

? In the beginning was the 1 who was called the

word & # 8230 ; ? This statement confirms the being of a

individual being. Subsequently in the text it is said that? the

word became flesh and dwelt among us? , therefore going

like a human. In contrast, the great Tao is? infinite? ;

it flows everyplace and is ever present, yet it can non

be seen or touched. It is? empty like a bowl? and

? bottomless? yet its capacity can non be exhausted. The

Tao? s ain intangibleness demonstrates the impression that it

is frameless and hence is non constructed into any

form or signifier.

While address and understanding remain the footing for

following Christianity, the Tao can non be spoken, and

hence can ne’er be to the full explained in words.

Harmonizing to the Gospel of John, in the Christian Bible,

God sent John down to earth to talk? the word? and take

the people to hold religion. In order for Christians to

get an apprehension of their religion, they must

have some signifier of learning or direction.

Christians go to church to hear? the word? that is

verbally preached to them through the words of a priest,

who acts as a retainer to God. With this being

understood it can be concluded that without linguistic communication, as

the footing for understanding, Christianity could non

exist. Taoism, on the other manus, emphasizes the fact

that it is mute and hence can ne’er be verbally

told or explained. Tao is described as being

? nameless? . It is exceeds beyond verbal communicating

and comprehension. ? Wordss can be used to talk of it,

but they can non be used to incorporate it. ?

Both Tao and God love and take attention of all of

creative activity. Every populating thing depends on them for life.

But the Tao is non a supreme being as God is to the

Christians because Taoism is non monotheistic. The chief

focal point in Taoism is non the worship of one God, but

alternatively coming into harmoniousness with Tao. Tao? apparels and

provenders all things but does non claim to be maestro over

them. ? Therefore he says, ? the existence and I exist together,

and all things and I are one. ? God, on the other manus,

bases above the existence a

s a higher being. He regulations

by power, puting certain criterions which Christians are

to populate by and obey in order to make redemption. The Ten

Commandments, besides known as? the jurisprudence of adult male? , are a set

of regulations, developed by God, that people are to stay by

in order to avoid error.

Another component that separates the Tao from God is

the manner in which they guide the universe. It is through

Supreme beings ain actions that Christians are guided, whereas Tao

regulations by non moving. God wagess those who lead a

virtuous life and punishes those who have sinned in

order to learn them the right manner to populate. Tao does non

rule the universe with force, ? it constantly takes no

action, and yet nil is left undone? .

Whether a individual chooses the way of the Taoist or

of a Christian they are finally taking towards the

same end of immortality. Both faiths believe that

there is an being without terminal, that a individuals psyche

is ageless and hence ne’er dies. In fact the psyche,

in both Taoism and Christianity, migrates to another

life where it lives in harmoniousness and cloud nine for all

infinity. But the Taoist thought of immortality greatly

differs from that in Christian beliefs. A Taoist wants

to accomplish Tao, to happen the manner, making a deeper life

where a individuals psyche becomes at one with the existence.

Christians believe that their psyche will populate everlastingly in

peace, one time they reach heaven, a much different province of

immortality than the Tao. Unlike Tao, Heaven is a

physical resettlement of a individuals psyche. When a psyche

ranges heaven it walks along side God, still bing

as a individual being. Person who achieves Tao nevertheless,

becomes at one with nature itself, unifying with all of

being. As stated in the text? Bing one with nature

is to be at one with Tao. ? Reaching Tao is non about a

specific re-location of the psyche as it is with Heaven in

Christianity. Alternatively Tao is about making a new degree

of consciousness which arises when the head and organic structure are

joined together and exceed into a deeper wisdom.

Similarly, in both Taoism and Christianity, one

must hold to follow and un-corruptive life style. If

one is to make either Tao or Heaven, they must avoid

all earthly enticements and desires that may take to the

pollution of a virtuous manner of life. Desires such as

aspiration, celebrity, and selfishness are seen as distractions

to a harmonious life. It is merely when one rids

his/herself of such desires that immortality can be

achieved. Despite these similar standards for ageless

life, the manner in which they follow these waies are

contrasting. A Christian follows a really rigorous set of

philosophies developed by God, and enforced by the church.

It is God itself that guides Christians, and shows them

? the manner? to carry through this end of ageless life.

Without God moving as a leader, Christians would hold no

construct of right from incorrect. In the absence of God? s

way they would non be able to of all time make Eden.

In Taoism, the manner to accomplish Tao is single, it

comes from inside the truster. The significance of Tao is

translated as? the manner? , but this manner can ne’er be

taught. Unlike God, who shows you? the manner? , Tao does

non specify a way for the Taoist, it must come from

within. Taoism? seeks naturalness? , following natures

rules in order to achieve an enlightened and

sceptered entryway into world. The chase of these

types of criterions will guarantee a life of felicity and

repose which far surpasses anything that all of

world? s inventiveness can invent.

It is evident in both Taoism and Christianity that

merely through proper life, by following a pure way,

can one accomplish the ultimate end of immortality. In

both faiths it is possible to keep a pure

life style merely when all desires and personal aspirations

are forsaken along the class of one? s life. However,

it is clear that the differences between the two

faiths far outweigh the similarities. Tao and God,

the two chief entities from each faith, are the

taking factors that divide Taoism and Christianity into

two really stray sets of beliefs. It can be concluded

that the Taoist construct of the immortal hereafter and

the method in which a individual reaches ageless life,

greatly differs from that of the Christian.

A limited
time offer!
Save Time On Research and Writing. Hire a Professional to Get Your 100% Plagiarism Free Paper