The Crucible Essay Research Paper The CrucibleI
Only $13.90 / page
The Crucible Essay, Research Paper
I saw the drama The Crucible and there were illustrations of manners of directing and moving that were really interesting. The production was put on by the University of Arizona? s theater section and as such the directing and playing had its good points and its bad 1s.
There was one scene in peculiar that appeared to be really good directed. Act two takes topographic point in the common room of the Proctor? s house about a hebdomad after the initial scene in the Reverend? s place. This scene was particularly good directed because of its length and the figure of Gallic scenes within it.
The infinite where this scene took topographic point was instead big, but there were obstructions that had to be dealt with by the manager. The blocking was done good in that at no point were any of the histrions in each other? s manner or upstaging each other. There was besides the usage of the props. At one point Mary Warren entered and gave a doll to Elizabeth Proctor. This doll was placed on the mantle and left entirely for a piece. Subsequently when the deputy came to collar Elizabeth the doll was rediscovered. It had been placed originally in a topographic point where it was still seeable and easy found. Another illustration is the arrangement of John Proctor? s whip. In the same kind of case the whip was placed originally in a topographic point where it was easy to acquire to subsequently in the scene.
The many Gallic scenes besides must hold been disputing to the manager. Different histrions were come ining and go forthing the common room throughout the full scene. The timing of these scenes was really good directed and made the scene flow swimmingly. The manager used the full phase and at no point was it unbalanced or lopsided.
One character I found prosecuting was the Reverend John Hale played by L. Jay Meyer. The ground I found him so interesting was because of the manner he went from a character I liked to one I disliked back to one I liked in the span of one drama.
When Reverend Hale was foremost introduced he seemed to be the maestro of the topic at manus, witchery. It appeared that he had all of the replies and would be able to bring around the misss that had been infected by the devils. He had merely come from a town with a similar job and had many books on the topic. At this point it looked as though he was traveling to be the Jesus of this small town, but that all changed shortly.
When the Judge came to town and started collaring people for suspected witchcraft the Reverend Hale was supporti
ng him. Hale believed what the misss said about all of the other adult females in town and helped collar them. Meyer did an first-class occupation of portraying Hale and made the audience believe that he was seeking to make the right thing. At this point the attitude towards Hale was get downing to turn towards the negative side, but that all shortly changed.
Once Elizabeth Proctor was arrested Hale made a alteration. Meyer played the function good by converting the audience that he had a kind of disclosure. He knew that Elizabeth was non a enchantress and tried to acquire her to make whatever it took to acquire her released. He attempted to acquire her to squeal, but when he realized that that would be incorrect he consoled her. It was merely after his long clip off that he came back to comfort John and Elizabeth. Meyer went from good cat to bad cat back to good cat through the drama and it was his portraiture of Hale that kept the audience with him the whole manner.
I have a friend that would hold gone to this production and perchance walked out. She is a theater traveling individual and has seen most of the shows that have gone through Phoenix. She has besides acted in a twosome of productions as good. The ground I say she might hold walked out is because of the playing. Other than Hale, the other functions seemed to be played in an over dramatic mode. The histrions and actresses on phase looked like histrions and actresses seeking to play their functions as opposed to the existent characters. I know that I saw one of the first public presentations, but lines were stumbled on and they seemed to be merely declaiming. The duologue did non flux good and their actions seemed calculated and over done.
One portion in specific was the concluding scene in the gaol when the justice and the deputy are trying to acquire John Proctor to squeal. The manner that Frank Mihelich, John Proctor, over did the stoping caused me to go forth the theater with a bad gustatory sensation in my oral cavity. I besides know that if I felt that manner so my friend would hold felt even worse. She ever seems more critical of dramas than I do. When Proctor signed the confession and so tore it up and gave his address about desiring to maintain his name, my friend would non hold been convinced. She would hold said that Mihelich could hold got the point of the address across more efficaciously with less emotion.
In all, the directing and moving both had its good points and its bad points. Unfortunately, the one good directed scene and the one convincing histrion would non hold been plenty to fulfill my friend, and it was non plenty to fulfill me.