The Current Restoration of Leonardo’s Last Supper
Some scholars believe that the current restoration of Leonardo’s Last Supper went too far because the originality of Leonardo’s work has been lost. Scholars believe that the restoration should have been undertaken to preserve such a famous masterpiece. 2. The current restoration of the Last Supper began in 1979 and took 20 years to restore. 3. The Last Supper had conservation problems almost from the moment that Leonardo completed it because Leonardo used a new, untried technique to paint it and so it began to deteriorate as soon as he completed it.
Restorers filled in the areas that were so far deteriorated that they could not even be salvaged by adding light watercolor. 5. The purpose in presenting heavily damaged areas with watercolor was to prevent the painting from looking like a “false icon”. 6. Leonardo’s Last Supper is looked upon as a famous piece of art and so by restoring it, it tends to lose the meaning. Therefore, I don’t agree that the painting should have undergone such an extensive cleaning and restoration.
The Current Restoration of Leonardo’s Last Supper Essay Example
When the painting was restored in the 17th century, there was a door under the painting that the restorers widened to ease passage and by doing so, the Christ’s legs and feet were cut off. Also, by attempting to cover up the deteriorations, restorers have covered up important elements such as wine glasses, finger bowls, etc. On top of that, there have been many attempts of painting over and touch ups that the painting no longer holds the same meaning as it did in 1498. The restoration only skewed the accuracy of the original painting.
The author’s main argument in this article is whether Michelangelo’s “David” is ready a restoration – whether it needs a clean-up, a complete restoration, or just remain deteriorated. 2. Out of the three options presented for the conservation of Michelangelo’s David, I believe the correct course of action would be to just clean it up. I think restoring it would cause a loss of originality just like Leonardo’s Last Supper. 3. Antonio Paolucci, the superintendent of Florentine art, had the final word in whether or not any restoration of David would take place..
Two methods that were proposed for the cleaning or restoration of David were the “wet” method proposed by Franca Falletti and the “dry” method proposed by Ms. Parronchi. The incentive with the “dry” method was so that the originality would remain and it was be restored in the gentlest way possible with soft brushes, cotton swabs, an eraser, and a chamois cloth. On the other hand, the “wet” method required a rigorous amount of work and could also be a threat to David. The “wet” method would consist of using gypsum and applying wet poultices using distilled water. Also, the brushing is a mechanical process.
A change that was made to Michelangelo’s David in the middle of the 16th century was the addition of a metal loincloth made of 28 fig leaves. This was necessary after the left arm from broken into 3 pieces in 1527 by rioters. 2. The statue was previously cleaned in 1843 with hydrochloric acid. 3. Ms. Parronchi resigned from the Accademia because of a dispute with Ms. Falletti regarding which process to use to clean up David. D. 1. The focus of this article LeWitt’s wall drawings and his merging of minimalist and conceptual art movements. Due to his extensive experience in architecture effects the process of his work and makes it stand out.
Even though he never associated himself with classical architecture, his work contains classical idealism. 2. Smith relates LeWitt’s wall drawings to Renaissance frescoes and architecture due to LeWitt’s use of big-scaled isometric forms and his Piero della Francesca palette of darkened pastels. Basically, his work consists of the same symmetry and harmony essential to classical architecture. 3. Lewitt’s drawings are drawn on the gallery walls by assistants. 4. What is the essence of LeWitt’s wall drawings? What makes LeWitt’s drawings more than just some lines on the wall? What was LeWitt’s inspiration for his wall drawings?