The Death Penalty 11 Essay Research Paper
The Death Penalty 11 Essay, Research Paper
The Punishment of Death
In this essay, H.L. Mencken has two statements that stand out in the beginning of this essay. These statements are against the punishment of decease, although his essay is in a manner, for it. The first 1 is, That hanging a adult male ( or frying him or gassing him ) is a awful concern, degrading to those who have to make it and revolting to those who have to witness it. ( Mencken 455 ) . The 2nd 1 is besides against it, That it is useless, for it does non discourage others from the same offense. ( Mencken 455 ) . These statements are evidently against the decease punishment.
Towards the terminal of his essay he gives us an illustration of his true statement. He says that the delay for the slayer and the household is the cruelest portion and he despises it. If people deserve the decease punishment, which he says people do, so they should be penalized about on the topographic point. He does non believe the clip in which the offense is committed and the punishment of decease should be pushed off every bit long as it is. I think he is right with this statement but, it seems as though he is against the punishment of decease. But, in
world he is non. His essay to me was falsely interpreted.
He must be for the decease punishment, he says Any lesser punishment leaves the people experiencing that the felon has got the better of society ( Mencken 457 ) . This means that the victim s household and friends feel as though the slayer has gotten off easy. There should be no acquiring off easy after you commit a slaying. I have so much regard and respect for human life, that I decidedly favor capital penalty. Murder is the most awful offense there is. Anything less than the decease punishment is an abuse to the victim, society and human race. Not penalizing the slayer to the fullest Tells me that we do non value the victim s life adequate to penalize the slayer to the full. This essay in my sentiment was awful, I did non like the manner he set it up, he did non take a solid side. It was written to be as though it is a gag and good story. I did non believe it was amusing, it merely boggled my head, I had a difficult clip seeking to calculate out that he is for the decease punishment. I do like the manner he described the delay. I thought that was the best portion because it was descriptive and I could understand where he is coming from.