The Fight For Creatine Essay Research Paper

8 August 2017

The Fight For Creatine Essay, Research Paper

Creatine is an amino acid that is produced in the pancreas, liver, and kidneys. The natural creatine that is produced in the organic structure replenishes adenosine triphosphate, which fuels musculus usage. Creatine helps to add in excess repeats during a lifting plan. When adding in excess repeats there are better opportunities of edifice musculus majority. Many people feel creatine should be banned merely like anabolic steroids because of long-run side effects. However, creatine is non every bit unsafe as some think and it should non be banned.

Creatine is non merely produced of course but can besides be bought as a addendum. Whether you buy it in pulverization or pill signifier it seems to hold the same consequence. Within the past few old ages creatine has become widely known as a addendum that can be bought to assist add majority to a individual? s organic structure.

We will write a custom essay sample on
The Fight For Creatine Essay Research Paper
or any similar topic specifically for you
Do Not Waste
Your Time

Only $13.90 / page

Many professional, college, and high school jocks can be seen utilizing this addendum during their day-to-day exercises to assist construct bulk faster. Some of these jocks have even been seen interrupting records that have been around for many old ages.

Mark McGwire will travel down in history as one of the greatest baseball participants of all clip. But will his image be tarnished because of his usage of androstenedione? No, because the drug has ne’er been banned in professional baseball. This is a drug that does many of the same thing that creatine does. Androstenedione is of course produced in the sex glands and adrenal secretory organ. In the liver, it is transformed into testosterone, which encourages musculus growing. ? McGwire says? andro? helps him develop harder and retrieve rapidly from hurts? ( Schrof ) .

When looking at Mark McGwire you see a 6-foot 5-inch, 250-pound mass of musculus. Obviously creatine has done something for him if he can bulk up musculus. Would he hold been able to interrupt the home-run record without the usage of creatine? It is difficult to state. Even more of import, will his usage of this cause enduring effects on his organic structure? Will at that place be long-run side effects or even short-run side effects that could do him to hold to halt playing baseball ( Schrof ) ?

When looking at some of the research 1 might see person say that creatine, in supplement signifier, could halt the normal production of creatine in user? s organic structure. Recent surveies show that when creatine was used in rats, it down-regulated their natural production of creatine in their organic structure. The surveies of these rats have caused inquiries on long-run effects of the usage of creatine. The scientists feel that this could do creatine synthesis lack. The symptoms for this lack are fatigue, musculus wasting, hapless exercising capacity, and neuromuscular lacks ( Kreider ) .

The information for long-run side effects in worlds is limited but there have been some surveies. They put people on creatine for five to 140 yearss and so watched their creatine degrees after they were taken off creatine. One survey showed that after four to six hebdomads the degree of of course produced creatine returned to normal. In theory, if the man-made creatine surpassed normal creatine production, the creatine in musculus should hold dropped below base degrees. When looking at jocks who have taken creatine and have now stopped you might anticipate them to demo some marks of creatine synthesis lack. However, this has non yet been seen. ? Presently, no grounds indicates that creatine supplementation for good suppresses the creatine synthesis in worlds? ( Kreider ) .

Creatine could be between 50 and 90 dollars. Despite the monetary value and the creatine is still really popular. Some high school football managers even say that their jocks should non take this drug. Not sing the advice of their managers, some of these jocks still take the addendum. Robert Presti, the proprietor of a wellness shop in New York, says that the creatine addendum is one of his best merchandising merchandises. The controver

sy over creatine has non prevented him from taking it. He says, ? My organic structure has responded good to it? ( Springen ) .

Some physicians say that creatine promotes desiccation and cramping. This is yet another myth of this drug. One mark of desiccation is low electrolyte degrees. With all the surveies on creatine there has ne’er been a determination of this unless the jock trained in a hot and humid ambiance. When looking at any jock who has trained in these conditions, desiccation could be found. Users of creatine have been known to cramp but non any more than jocks who don? Ts take it. There are no scientific surveies that support the thought that creatine causes cramping and desiccation ( Kreider ) .

Doctors say the usage of creatine could besides do an disquieted tummy and diarrhoea. The surveies that show these consequences are rare. Even when these were some symptoms, they were non major plenty to halt taking the addendums. When these indicants were noted, most of the takers used more than the recommended dose. With these few stray instances, GI jobs have non diminished the popularity of creatine among jocks ( Kreider ) .

? Creatine seems to work? ( Sullivan ) . Researchers put 19 adult females on a ten-week weight-lifting plan. The adult females on the creatine gained strength on the leg imperativeness by 46 per centum. The adult females who were non on a creatine addendum merely gained about 25 per centum of leg strength. The creatine group besides gained seven lbs, which was twice that of the controlled group. This addition of weight can be directed to muscle mass. This shows that while taking creatine a individual can derive musculus faster. Some still think that some of this weight addition could be H2O, non muscle even though they are going stronger ( Sullivan ) .

The long-run side effects of creatine are unknown. This is true. No 1 truly knows how creatine will respond with the organic structure in the hereafter. Some surveies have been done on patients with gyrate wasting and babies with creatine-synthesis lack. In these surveies, creatine was administered at 1.5 gms to 8 gms a twenty-four hours for up to five old ages. ? Available grounds indicates that short- and long-run creatine supplementation does non present a medical hazard when taken at recommended doses? ( Kreider ) .

Most surveies show taking creatine leads to greater developing versions. When an jock is able to develop harder they are able to construct more musculus faster. Constructing more musculus faster means that they will be able to stronger, faster. The consequence of this will give them an advantage over their opposition. They will be stronger and will be able to out execute the resistance.

Some people ask why should high school pupils be taking this drug? I don? t think that they should. They should non be taking any addendums that are non natural to their organic structures. The sum of endocrines that are in a normal high school pupil is already giving them the energy to bulk up. The excess endocrines could merely do more jobs than what will assist them.

When making research on a drug I would look at the Olympics. Most of their regulations will modulate any drug that is non appropriate for jocks even before it comes out. The Olympic commission has non banned creatine. Therefore, why should at that place be an all out prohibition of this drug? If anything, it should be the determination of the conferences, squads, and managers. Not a determination made by the authorities.


Kreider, Richard B. ? 6 Creatine frights: Real concern or false dismay? ? Joe Weider? s Muscle & A ; Fitness November 1999: 160-161. .

Schrof, Joannie M. ? McGwire Hits the Pills. ? U.S. News & A ; World Report September 7, 1998: 53-54. .

Sullivan, Dana. ? Crazy for creatine. ? Joe Weider? s Shape October 1999: 40-42. .

Springen, Karen, Marc Peyser, and Jennifer Lach. ? The New Muscle Candy. ? Newsweek January 12, 1998. .

How to cite this essay

Choose cite format:
The Fight For Creatine Essay Research Paper. (2017, Aug 08). Retrieved April 20, 2019, from
A limited
time offer!
Get authentic custom
ESSAY SAMPLEwritten strictly according
to your requirements