The Main Themes In
& # 8220 ; Godhead Of The Flies & # 8221 ; Essay, Research Paper
* What do you believe are the chief subjects of the narrative? Identify and discourse them.
In a promotion questionnaire, Golding described the subject of? Lord Of The Flies? as follows: ? The subject is an effort to follow the defects of society back to the defects of human nature & # 8230 ; The whole book is symbolic in nature. & # 8221 ; In other words Golding sees the chief subject of his book as the nature of adult male and the contemplation of the human personality on society.
The book explores the interior struggles of adult male in which one discovers the human nature and personality that comes across in the book- good versus immorality, reason and logic versus unreason and 34342, civilisation versus primitive, peace and tolerance versus war and force. In each of these struggles pick is in adult male? s manus, and yet, as the book demonstrates in such a clear mode, it seems that adult male? s nature is to do the incorrect pick.
Only $13.90 / page
At the beginning of book, despite the state of affairs, there seems to be no evil, but merely good- a Eden island with no grownups, the harmonic and about natural friendly relationship between Jack and Ralph, and the general temper in the group. The lone intimation of immorality is the badgering attitude of the group towards Piggy ( ? Shut up, Fatty? pg. 21 ) . However, as the narrative continues, and the male childs become more ungratified and less positive of being rescued, the one time warm relationship between Jack and Ralph becomes more tense and distant. One group, led officially by Ralph divides itself self-consciously into two minor groups and though officially under one leader, the two groups drift farther and farther apart. Finally, in a tantrum of fury, Jack leaves the group, followed loyally by his huntsmans, to organize a new folk. Here comes the split between all the interior struggles. While Jack represents the immorality, unreason and incorrect in adult male, Ralph and his group seem to stand for the good, the civilisation, and the logic.
The duty of civilisation is thrust upon the older male childs, nevertheless, they slowly abandon their duties, in order to function themselves and their 687698. The more they abandon their duties, they lose their civilisation, yet gain immorality and easy uncover their ain sadistic and barbarous inclinations.
One representative of the struggle between good and evil is the much feared yet fanciful? Beast? . The promise of merriment, plentiful nutrient and chiefly security from the dreaded animal draws the littlen? s to Jack and his battalion of huntsmans. The moving of the minority from the good group to the bad group is the first illustrations of evil over-coming good.
The impact of? The Beast? on their lives is so strong that the fright invariably surrounds them, an
vitamin D therefore, so does evil. From this point on, most of the actions of Jack? s group are done in fright of the animal. The huntsmans, led by Jack, invariably terrorise the other group and frighten them with narratives about? The Beast? . They start to steal from the other group ( for illustration fire and the runing knife ) , and sacrifice the caput of a sow to? The Beast? ( which becomes the Lord of the Flies ) .
Finally they start killing hogs and dancing around a fire in what seems as a spiritual rite in which they act an onslaught on the hog while shouting war calls towards? The Beast? : ? The dark sky was shattered by a bluish-white cicatrix. An instant later, the noise was on them, like the blow of a mammoth whip. The chant rose a tone in torment. ? Kill the animal! Cut his pharynx! Spill his blood! ? ? ( P. 152 ) . At this phase the immorality is so powerful, and the male childs are so profoundly caught in their enchantment around the animal that when Simon comes running towards them, with the truth about the animal, they mistake him for the Beast and viciously kill him. This phase is an antonym of the beginning where at that place seems to be no immorality but merely good. Now there is no good but merely evil. Once once more Piggy is the exclusion, for he does non take part in the manic slaying of Simon. This animal is expected to make as the male childs fear it will make, which is to harry them. What the male child and humanity do non see is that the animal is themselves, and they are the perpetrators.
Yet this is non the terminal of the immorality. When the huntsmans steal Piggy? s spectacless because of their desire for fire the reader witnesses yet another act of evil, but most horrific of the huntsmans? actions is the slaying of Piggy. This combined with the decease of Simon showed that any good still left in the heads of the huntsmans, was now destroyed.
But it is the symbol of the sow? s caput that represents the true immorality in Golding? s book. The? Lord of the Flies? is the Devil, Satan, who brings decay and demoralisation. Although there is non existent worship in any spiritual mode of Satan, it is this that drives the male childs to their lawlessness and immorality.
When Ralph and Piggy go out to Castle Rock to plead with Jack and his group to be just and return Piggy? s spectacless, because without them, Piggy could non see, the response from the group- Roger? s dropping a bowlder onto Piggy? s caput, directing him winging 40 pess to his decease, is the concluding confrontation of good with evil, civilisation with the primitive, logic with unreason, and peace with war.
In The Lord of the Flies, Golding suggests that world is a barbarian and barbarous species that even without the universe of the grownup, can non defy immorality, which in the oculus? s of Golding is the true nature and human personality of adult male.