The Perils of Obedience and the Stanford Prison Experiment

A paper which draws comparisons between the books “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram and the “Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip Zimbardo.

The paper shows that both “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram and the “Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip Zimbardo essentially demonstrate the potential for “evil” in ordinary citizens when placed in situations where stark authority is pitted against the individual’s own moral imperatives (Milgram) or when deindividuated potential perpetrators are given total power over powerless victims (Zimbardo). The paper shows that although the experiments differed vastly in design and methodology, the point of both experiments was to observe how far an individual would go in inflicting increasing pain on a victim.

How to cite this essay

Choose cite format:
The Perils of Obedience and the Stanford Prison Experiment. (2015, Apr 23). Retrieved December 13, 2019, from https://newyorkessays.com/essay-the-perils-of-obedience-and-the-stanford-prison-experiment/
A limited
time offer!
Get authentic custom
ESSAY SAMPLEwritten strictly according
to your requirements