The World of Doublespeak Essay Sample
“The World of Doublespeak” from the book English 121 Readings was written by William Lutz. This essay defines what doublespeak is and gives illustrations of types of doublespeak. Lutz besides explains why doublespeak is non an effectual signifier of communicating.
Lutz defines doublespeak as “…language that pretends to pass on but truly doesn’t. It is linguistic communication that makes the bad seem good. the negative appear positive. the unpleasant appear attractive or at least tolerable. ” He states that when doublespeak is used. it may look so existent that you may non even acknowledge it as doublespeak. When listening or reading he encourages inquiring simple who. what and why inquiries about what is being said. If you are unable to reply the inquiries. it is likely doublespeak is being used.
In the essay. Lutz states that there are four sort of doublespeak and gives definitions and illustrations of each. The first is the euphemism.
Only $13.90 / page
The intent of the euphemism is to utilize words to mask the true significance of what is being said. A euphemism is frequently used to avoid aching the feelings of another although it may besides be used to cover up rough facts or content. The 2nd illustration of doublespeak is slang. Jargon is linguistic communication that is peculiar to certain professions such as physicians and attorneies. To person non associated with the specific group and their linguistic communication. slang will non do sense. It is frequently used by persons who wish to sound more intelligent or of import. Gobbledygook is the 3rd sort of doublespeak described by Lutz.
This type of doublespeak uses large words and long sentences to confound the audience. The last type of doublespeak described is hyperbolic linguistic communication. It is linguistic communication that makes simple things seem more complicated than they are. Throughout the essay the writer states his grounds why he believes doublespeak is so awful. His primary ground is that because this linguistic communication is frequently fallacious. it is capable of “corrupting idea. ” If our ideas are corrupted and we believe merely what we hear through doublespeak our world may be non what we believe it to be.