Was Machiavelli Satan Essay Research Paper The

10 October 2017

Was Machiavelli Satan? Essay, Research Paper

The Church accused Niccolo Machiavelli of being Satan for composing his book The Prince. Machiavelli completed The Prince in 1513. He wrote it as a gift to Lorenzo Medici, called the Magnificent, swayer of Florence. The political positions Machiavelli expressed in his book went against the divinity of the Church, specifically the Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes.

Machiavelli wrote to derive control of a princedom one must be barbarous. & # 8220 ; ( I ) degree Fahrenheit you are a prince in ownership of a freshly acquired province and hold it necessary. . . to eliminate those who can or must assail you. . . . & # 8221 ; , you must make so to protect your princedom. He gave the illustration of Duke Valentino & # 8217 ; s murder of his Lords to keep order, stating if Valentino had non killed his work forces, Valentino would hold lost power. The Bible strongly forbids the violent death of anyone. The Sixth Commandment states & # 8220 ; You shall non murder. & # 8221 ; In what is known as the Beatitudes, from Jesus & # 8217 ; Sermon on the Mount, the Bible besides says those who are mild shall inherit the Earth. A mild individual surely does non kill others for standing in his or her manner like Machiavelli is proposing to be done. Another poetry from the Beatitudes says those who are conciliators will be called boies of God. Conciliators do non kill either. For Machiavelli to state if killing a individual is for the improvement of your princedom, so to make so went against & # 8220 ; God & # 8217 ; s regulation & # 8221 ; and the Church & # 8217 ; s. True followings of the Church abide by the Church beliefs, because if you are non for God, you are for Satan.

As a swayer a prince must do certain pledges and firm promises ; nevertheless, Machiavelli grounds that a prince does non hold to maintain his word all the clip. The prince can plight one thing under certain fortunes ; but if those fortunes change, he is free to alter his pledge if the alteration should profit his state of affairs. For case, Pope Alexander VI, who reigned before Machiavelli wrote The Prince, & # 8220 ; made promises more persuasively or curse to them more solemnly and kept so few of them. . . . & # 8221 ; Pope Alexander VI besides got what he wanted by lead oning others. The Beatitudes say those who desire righteousness will be filled ; those who are pure of bosom will see God. Righteousness and pureness do non happen through misrepresentation. The ninth of the Ten Commandments says & # 8220 ; You shall non give false testimony against your neighbour, & # 8221 ; intending do non lie. Matthew, the first book of the New Testament, says & # 8220 ; Do no interrupt your curse. . . . & # 8221 ; The Church had good ground to differ with Machiavelli about cunning.

& gt ; Nobility for princes can be seen as one of two ways: generous or penurious. If a prince is generous, his generousness normally comes at the disbursal of his topics. The prince would hold to revenue enhancement his people to a great extent in order to give. & # 8220 ; This will get down to do him abominable to his topics and. . . will lose him the regard of everyone. & # 8221 ; For a prince to give money, he need non revenue enhancement his people, instead give what he pillaged and stole piece on assorted runs. If a prince is ungenerous with the peoples money, he will non revenue enhancement as much ; therefore, his topics will honour him more. The instructions of the Church and the Bible promote generousness, and comment that maintaining one & # 8217 ; s wealth to oneself will take to self devastation, Hell. The instructions likewise include & # 8220 ; You shall non steal. & # 8221 ;

Although his thoughts were contrary to those of the Church and of the Bible, Machiavelli can non be compared with Satan. He was advancing the endurance of a princedom at any cost. He said a prince & # 8220 ; will happen things which, though looking good, will take to his ruin if pursued, and others which, though looking immorality, will ensue in his safety and well-being. & # 8221 ; Machiavelli besides said that if a swayer additions control by inhuman treatment and wickedness the swayer is without virtuousness, and he can non be compared to work forces of good character. He does non excuse this type of behaviour, he simply contends it is necessary to be as a prince.

Assorted people in the Bible killed others. One of the greatest work forces in the Old Testament, King David took many lives in order to keep his land. Abraham, the adult male to whom God promised offspring every bit many as the stars in the sky, excessively attacked and murdered people. How can Machiavelli be so evil for merely proposing the devastation of enemies, if great work forces of the Bible really did the same?

Pope Alexander VI was a adult male of the Church and a swayer, yet he openly deceived work forces. Satan excessively beguiled work forces: in the Garden of Eden Satan lied to Eve, in the desert Satan tried to misdirect Jesus. Was Alexander of all time compared to Satan as Machiavelli was? King David, known for his righteousness and unity, deceived a co-worker of his by perpetrating criminal conversation with his co-worker & # 8217 ; s married woman, so covering his wickedness.

At one clip, Machiavelli & # 8217 ; s name was compared to Satan & # 8217 ; s. His ideas and

thoughts written in his book The Prince contradicted those of the Church and the Bible. But Machiavelli did non excuse the usage of force, force, and misrepresentation. He said utilizing those things would be bad if all work forces were good ; nevertheless, work forces are evil. Harmonizing to him, all work forces have a small of Satan in them.

A limited
time offer!
Save Time On Research and Writing. Hire a Professional to Get Your 100% Plagiarism Free Paper