Washington Dc In Opposition Of Imf And
World Bank Essay, Research Paper
On Saturday, April 15, dissenters gathered in Washington DC in resistance of the IMF and World Bank. The two establishments were to hold their spring meeting this weekend and the about 10 thousand dissenters, whose chief point is the riddance of poorness, paraded down the streets of DC The dissenters feel that what the IMF and World Bank do non see the short term effects of their proposals for economic growing, which include unemployment and increased poorness. The dissenters feel that the lone people profiting from such thoughts are the big corporations. Fortunately, though many were arrested, none were earnestly injured, as was the instance with dissenters in Seattle in November. This was due to the fact that the Washington constabulary prepared good in progress, procuring the appropriate edifices every bit good as buying new public violence cogwheel. This event is an illustration of a societal motion. This was merely an organized group of people that gathered for the intent of defying alteration ( In this instance, the schemes discussed by the aforesaid establishments ) through their corporate action. Specifically, this type of societal motion is called a opposition motion, because this group was in resistance to alter of a certain facet of our society. The chief ground why militants gathered in protest on Saturday was to expose the World Bank and IMF patterns and policies that the dissenters believe have led to the devolution of the environment and the societal want
in the developing world. One protester was quoted “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” as she is a member of George Washington Students Against Sweatshops. However, as passionate as they were, few protesters actually got violent and many were arrested before anything erupted. The dominant emotion of the event was anger, but the people were not actively hostile. The crowd was simply voicing their opinion on the issues of globalization, and manifesting the potential repercussions that the actions of the two institutions may have. The emotions throughout the protest were definitely negative, but anger or frustration seemed to run consistently throughout. The event continues through Sunday afternoon, though consequences of the event thus far have been slight if any. Many people were arrested, the main charge being parading without a permit. The meeting between the World Band and the IMF was not even disturbed during the protest, as police had barricaded some fifty blocks around these buildings. The protesters in this case were rather non-violent in nature, and the police were quite peaceful when they did have to arrest someone. This protest was quite tame in comparison to the one in Seattle last November. I believe that this is due to the advanced planning of the police in securing the area before people even gathered to protest. I believe that the protester’s message has been heard through the large amount of publicity that they have received, and that has made the protest successful.