If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving them a fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people?

We will write a custom essay sample
on YCJA good or bad? or any similar
topic specifically for you

Hire Writer

Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a “Harsh” enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them in the long run.

YCJA Good … and Bad?

If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving thema fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people?

Page 2 YCJA good or bad? Essay

Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a “Harsh” enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them in the long run.

YCJA Good … and Bad?

If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving them a fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people?

Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a “Harsh” enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them
in the long run.

YCJA Good … and Bad?

If you were a young offender of a misdemeanor would it be harsh for the judge to treat them as if they were an adult? Would you think by giving them equal consequences it could make their whole future more challenging? The YCJA (youth criminal justice act) is positive legislation that must be upheld but should be amended when it comes to violent crimes. This act allows for youth offenders who are less mature to not be exposed and have a second chance for a bright future. At the same time giving them a fair, long consequence to teach them a lesson. Some suggest that by giving them a more adult like punishment it would force the young offenders into not repeating their actions again. Are they right? Do we need to make changes to this act to accommodate the opinion of these people?

Some may argue that the judges are too merciful and that the young offenders and adults should be treated equally. This is because they think the offenders aren’t getting a “Harsh” enough punishment. Thus causing them to just go back and repeat their actions, and may even be escalated to more violent crimes causing the safety of the community to decrease. They are wrong because adolescent offenders are generally more immature and most likely more peer pressured into committing crimes. They are quick to act and don’t think ahead before they say or do something that might affect them in the long run.

See More on ,

Related Posts

Tiffany from New York Essays

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/MdQVRT